Development of a Modeling Software Tool to Optimize Energy Performance of Medium-Size Office Buildings at the Early Design Stage
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Building energy modeling is an important tool for low-energy building design. An energy modeling tool is used to estimate energy consumption, peak heating and cooling load for sizing mechanical equipment, and to demonstrate compliance with building codes and standards. Modeling tools are designed to evaluate building performance associated with a set of building specifications but it is difficult to predict building loads at the early design stage because most design features have not yet been specified. In addition, the designer must have experience and insight regarding the design features that most strongly influence building performance. \nIn this thesis, a new modeling tool, entitled Excel-Based Load Model (EBLM), was developed to aid designers in the early design stage to estimate building loads, and to size/specify the building components that most strongly affect the overall building performance. EBLM is an open source tool that uses Excel as the calculation engine, creating the advantage that users may modify the program according to their individual interests or project needs. \nEBLM is a single zone modeling tool that consists of three parts: inputs, load calculations, and outputs. The load calculations use the conduction time series (CTS) and radiant time series (RTS) methods to account for the thermal storage effect that delays cooling load. \n One of the unique features of EBLM is the ability to model slat-type operable shading systems. Users can specify one of three shading control strategies. Results can be presented in hourly, monthly, or annual format. The program also outputs the percentage of building loads for each building component in figures and tables. \nThe EBLM has been validated with the commonly used eQUEST model; the difference is about 8% for the sum of all building loads. \nEBLM was also used to perform a series of simulations to examine the influence of building components that are considered to be important. The major conclusions were: \n•\tHigh performance building specifications significantly reduce building loads, and energy-efficient mechanical equipment could further reduce energy consumption. \n•\tAn outdoor operable shading system can be used to effectively block excess solar gain and to help reduce cooling load in summer months, but can also be operated to allow solar gain and to reduce heating load in winter months. \n•\tUsing an outdoor temperature shading control strategy, low solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) windows with an outdoor operable shading system have better energy performance than high SHGC windows with outdoor operable shading system in Toronto. \n•\tAs found in many studies, the window-to-wall ratio (WWR) has a significant influence on building performance. Lower WWR can minimize both the conductive heat transfer and alleviate excess solar gain. \n•\tLowering the WWR from 40% to 30% has a similar effect on energy use as deploying outdoor operable shading system.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».