THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PHARMACY WORKLOAD MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR THE CANADIAN FORCES
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Time motion and workload measurement studies have been valuable management tools since the early 1900's. They have been successfully applied to many situations and occupations to increase worker productivity and to aid managers in determining staffing levels.\n\nPharmacy staffing levels were historically determined by intuition and various rules of thumb. By the 1960's pharmacy managers recognized the need for a more scientific method of determining proper staffing levels. The advent of clinical pharmacy services made this requirement more critical.\n\nA review of the literature shows that Rothenbuhler and Archambault, Summerfield, Hammel, Levin and Toohey used time motion studies to develop various pharmacy workload measurement systems. However, since these systems were developed in only 1 or 2 hospitals, they were difficult to implement in other pharmacy departments across the country.\n\nIn Canada, Schnell conducted a study entitled, "The Development of a Canadian Hospital Pharmacy Workload Measurement System". Since his study was to provide a data base useful to all Canadian hospitals, Schnell first determined what constituted pharmacy work in Canada and then developed national standards of practice. Stopwatch time studies where then\nconducted in 13 hospitals representing all geographical areas of the country. The results provided the definition of 290 distinct elements of pharmacy work and the average time to complete each element.\n\nThe purpose of this study was to develop a new pharmacy workload measurement system for the Canadian Forces. They presently use a line item issue system. In this study, a total of 18 workload units which describe military pharmacy work were identified. These workload units were then defined using elements which were reported in other studies or determined\nby direct observation of pharmacy work during on site visits to military pharmacies. The average time to complete each element was taken from the studies in which it was reported or determined by stopwatch time study during the on site visits. Adding the element times together gave the average time required to complete a workload unit. \n\nNon-measurable work was identified by having military pharmacy staff self-report daily activities and the time spent on each activity. Any activity which could not be placed under one of the defined workload units\nwas considered non-measureable workload. In this study, non-measurable workload was 50% of measurable workload or 33% of the total departmental workload.\n\nA new workload reporting form was designed to present the new workload units and non-measurable workload. This form allowed for the easy comparison of the time spent on the various activities or category of activities. \n\nThe new workload measurement system using the sum of measurable workload plus the actual non-measurable workload from the self-reporting forms was compared (by paired T -test) against the present line item issue system. The sum of measurable workload plus 50% of measurable workload was also compared to the present system. In both cases the new workload measurement system captured a significantly greater amount of productive time than the present system.\n\nThis study concluded that the new workload measurement system better described the actual work being done in military pharmacy departments. It also was more efficient than the present line item issued system because it captured a greater amount of productive time over the same reporting period.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle