Down Feather Extraction Project Design
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Canada Goose requires a redesign of their down feather extraction process to improve their sustainability efforts. The objective of the project is to improve the process increasing the efficiency of down extraction. The extracted down will be processed and re-used in future products by the company. The design should improve the current extraction rate of approximately 50% to upwards of 90% for all Canada Goose jackets while minimizing human intervention in the process. Additional needs identified by the client include a maximum budget of $150,000 CAD, maintained or reduced cycle time, durability, ease of cleaning, and an appropriate noise level during operation along with worker safety. This report contains information on the project scope and objectives with details provided by the client. This is followed by the concept generation and selection process applied to select the final design. Furthermore, this report presents the design developed to improve the extraction of down feathers, accompanied by a Computer-Aided Design model, engineering drawings, Bill of Materials, and a Standard Operating Procedure. Recommendations and future work items to improve the process are included as well. The final design extraction rate is greater than 90% through testing in the prototype developed. Different jacket loads were tested to determine the point at which the extraction rate was below the required 90%, after which the size of the design was scaled accordingly. The cost for the design including materials and assembly is $7480 CAD with a contingency reserve of 15% added to material costs. The cycle time has been reduced to 15 minutes for lightweight jackets and 25 minutes for regular jackets from the 45 minutes currently. The final design uses airflow to create separation between the jacket pieces and down feathers in a 24” diameter duct through turbulence. The design ductwork requires an expansion from a 6” spark-resistant blower output to the 24” separation duct while maintaining uniform airflow. The design incorporates an expansion to 16” before expanding to 24” for a smaller change in static pressure. The 24” separation duct is followed by a reduction to the 16” diameter continuing to a collection system of the client’s choosing. An air filter present at a T-junction prior to the collection system leads to a muffler which reduces noise. The jackets are cut using scissors and inserted through an upward duct at a wye connection sealed by a hand-removable end cap. The design incorporates a variable frequency drive to control airflow within the ductwork. A mesh screen in the separation duct stops the jacket pieces from following the airflow and down into the collection system. Maintenance and cleaning of the system can be done through hand-removable access doors on the bottom 16” segment and the 24” duct below the mesh screen. Cleaning of the ducts is required between cycles to reduce the risk of system blockage. After the extraction process the jacket pieces are removed Final Report iii December 9, 2020 through the access door on the 16” duct at the bottom. The system is supported by mounting rails and support straps to the floor and walls and attaching hangers to the ceiling. As identified above, all the client needs have been addressed and were an integral component of the concept generation and selection process leading to the final design. The goals for this project have been achieved by implementing a design that is composed of HVAC ducting and dependent on the airflow within the ducting.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,040 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».