Doctoral Programs in Occupational Science: Diversity and Potential
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The intent of occupational science was to produce knowledge of occupation to support occupational therapy and to produce disciplinary academics (Clark, 2006; Clark et al, 1991; Yerxa, 1991, 1993, 1998). This panel includes overviews of five occupational science doctoral programs. Discussion will address how disciplinary doctoral education contributes to the science, as well as the successes, challenges, and pedagogy inherent in doing so.\nColorado State University\nThe interdisciplinary Ph.D. in Occupation and Rehabilitation Science at Colorado State University seeks to advance research, education and practice pertaining to this core subject: human performance and participation in everyday occupations and contexts. The first class began in fall 2013. The program requires students to support their dissertation work with scholarship of relevance to the core subject from the disciplines of occupational science and rehabilitation science. Individualized programs of study include in-depth immersion in mentored research experiences, and an accelerated MS. to Ph.D. option exists for entry-level occupational therapy students.\nTowson University\nThe mission of the Department at Towson University is to promote education, research, and services that address occupational engagement and justice in support of the health and well-being of persons, organizations, and populations. Initiated in 2000, the doctoral program prepares graduates to expand knowledge of factors influencing the participation of people in their daily life activities or test theories of occupation. Core courses include the origin and evolution of occupational science and quality of life of individuals, communities, and populations.\nUniversity of North Carolina: Chapel Hill\nThe mission of UNC: Chapel Hill is to produce outstanding occupational scientists who develop, expand, and disseminate knowledge about occupation and translate that knowledge to various therapeutic arenas. The first doctoral cohort was admitted in 2005 and 13 students are currently enrolled. The curriculum follows a traditional Ph.D. course of study and offers seminars in five domains: core foundations in occupational science, topics of interest in occupational science, cognates on occupational and human activity, research design and methodology, and grant writing. Graduates are trained to excel in both teaching and research.\nUniversity of Southern California\nCreating the first Ph.D. in occupational science in 1989, the USC Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy envisioned a cutting-edge discipline devoted to generating new and useful knowledge. Through a rigorous curriculum, the Division produces career scientists capable of securing competitive funding and positions at research intensive universities. Nearly 25 years later, 60 scholars have graduated from USC into academic positions worldwide while research within the Division informs both practice and theory.\nUniversity of Western Ontario\nThe occupational science field at the University of Western Ontario investigates a range of concepts in connection to occupation. An interdisciplinary program prepares graduates for academic, research, and policy-related careers. One of ten fields within a Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Graduate Program, first admissions occurred in 2006. Seven doctoral and five masters students have completed: six doctoral and six masters students are enrolled. Requirements include an occupational science theoretical foundations seminar, a comprehensive examination and dissertation, a methodology course and an elective.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,056 | 0,055 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,020 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».