Getting On Track With Green Growth: Exploring The Planning Of Transit- Oriented Communities
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This paper explores the planning of Transit-Oriented Communities with a focus on two of Canada's most populous cities - Vancouver and Toronto. The current state of practice is investigated through case studies of the Cambie Corridor Plan in Vancouver and the Eglinton Connects Study in Toronto, aiming to uncover perspectives, challenges and success factors of these projects. Moreover, the research explores how sustainability beyond conventional Transit-Oriented Development practices is incorporated into the case studies, and whether these areas may result in what could be considered 'Green Transit-Oriented Development' – a term used for an enhanced ultra-environmentally friendly form of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD). \nThe paper finds that these cities do well in terms of planning for Transit-Oriented Communities with the above projects, and transit-oriented planning efforts are supported by a solid policy framework at the regional and provincial levels. Both cities selected planning at the corridor scale as the preferred approach, as well as an emphasis on the shift to predominantly mid-rise development. Common initial challenges were exhibited in both cases, mainly in terms of partner collaboration and public engagement. Yet in the end, the establishment of strong partnerships and public involvement are also perceived as key success factors. Political support is recognized as a strongly influential factor, which can either stifle planning projects such as Cambie and Eglinton, or encourage them to become transformational opportunities. The influence from varying levels of political support is particularly illustrated with the ways the cities pursue sustainability. Beyond conventional transit-oriented development practices, the ambition and bold greening standards of Vancouver will see that the Cambie Corridor results in LEED gold development. In addition, Vancouver has capitalized on the anticipated redevelopment to ensure the integration of energy planning and promote a corridor serviced entirely by a low-carbon district energy network. Conversely, the Eglinton project displayed a mandate span that was limited in terms of advancing sustainability initiatives, and neither green building development nor energy planning were a part of the Study scope. Advanced green building is reliant upon incentives from the Toronto Green Standard Tier 2 achievements and the potential for district energy was seemingly overlooked. Thus, the paper concludes that Vancouver presents a leading example of synergistic planning that directs transit and low-carbon supported density, and better exhibits a green TOD-like endeavour. Finally, Toronto and other cities could learn from Vancouver and strive to improve sustainability goals, cultural commitment, and enabling planning policy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».