A grounded Theory Investigation of Self-Identified Female Students' Mental Health Perception, Mental Health Factors, and Help-Seeking Behaviour
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract\nThe purpose of this integrated-article dissertation was to explore self-identified female students’ understanding of mental health, mental health factors, and help-seeking behaviours. Young adults often face multiple stressors in their daily lives and must find ways to prevent, address, or overcome stressors that can lead to emotional and physical distress. University life can be more stressful because of greater responsibilities and independence during this age period. Increasingly, post-secondary school students are recognized as an at-risk population for poor mental health. It is worth noting that female students experienced greater levels of stress compared to other genders. Poor mental health can contribute to poor academic performance and excessive alcohol consumption. Transition-aged youth (17-29 years) of all genders are particularly at risk of developing mental health problems, yet they are one of the least likely demographic groups to seek help. In a state of mental health, individuals are more prepared to take healthy risks, actively contribute to society, and gain life satisfaction. The undertaking for mental well-being is a common desire for oneself, students, and loved ones. However, limited research has been conducted about perceptions and attitudes of young adults, especially among female students, regarding mental health and help-seeking behaviours. A constructivist grounded theory study was conducted, and semi-structured interviews were undertaken between January and March 2023 with 22 self-identified female students who were enrolled in post-secondary programs at a university in Ontario, Canada. Participants shared their insights during in-depth individual interviews. The following eighteen themes emerged from students data during data analysis: psychological wellbeing, socioeconomic factors, social and societal influences on students’ wellbeing, holistic wellbeing perspectives, academic perspectives, career and financial perspectives, life and future perspectives, coping mechanisms, healthcare engagement challenges, psychological barriers, relational barriers, personal challenges, seeking professional and non-professional support, integrated support, self-reliance and self-help. The findings demonstrated that students’ advocacy for the promotion of mental health practices has a strong impact on their overall well-being.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».