kihteyhayak pihkswestamawnan: Wisdom Keepers Will Speak for Us
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Chris Scribe’s dissertation is premised around Indigenous leadership and learning. He worked with the University of Saskatchewan Human Ethics board to redesign what constitutes relational ethics and sources of knowledge for what traditionally has constituted a “literature review.” His work is premised on the knowledge of traditional Elders and how that knowledge is “owned”, “(re)-presented” and granted source credit. Chris’ dissertation is framed through a creative Indigenous cosmology that privileges orality, experiential learning, and artistic expression. Rather than offering a written work that privileges the language of the colonizer, his work is based in an oral and video docu-story that incorporates cultural expression and symbology. In this journey, Chris articulates through dance, artistic expression, and kinship the ways in which ancestral knowledge of leadership and learning is enacted, along with how he positions himself in his responsibilities to the ancestors, to the land, and to this knowledge. His work maintains academic standards of rigour but is organized in a non-traditional format. Throughout the video, he situates himself in his social location, and also his ancestral territorial locations, from where he explains the impetus for his work on Indigenous leadership and education, its significance, and his role and space. He then explains the Indigenous cosmology within which he is working, describing it through the use of a framework that he has created using Indigenous symbolism, life cycle, and relationships to learning and leading. He discusses the ethical journey he has travelled to incorporate the appropriate protocols in which he has engaged (through the University of Saskatchewan and with Knowledge Keepers) in order to access and share knowledge from the Elders to whom he has spoken on issues of leadership and learning (that also informs his conceptualization). He speaks about how he represents his learnings on educational leadership and his role (and others’ responsibilities) for using this knowledge to inform leadership practice. The final portion of the docu-story includes the overlaying of Indigenous leadership story-work over the “text” of a treaty document in order to represent the juxtapositions of understandings at play in the relationship between colonizers and Indigenous peoples that has impacted constructions of learning and leadership for Indigenous peoples. The final analysis culminates in an “accounting” of his research and learning on a buffalo robe.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,017 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,011 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,018 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».