Liquidity regulation for Canadian NBFIs
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As recent macroeconomic stress and a changed interest rate environment in Canada exposed vulnerabilities, and OSFI included transmission risk from the non-bank financial intermediary sector among its risk outlook for 2024, understanding what liquidity regulation is necessary to ensure financial stability in Canada has become an important discussion. This thesis investigates how money market mutual funds impact the financial stability of the Canadian banking sector to determine how these NBFIs should be regulated differently in the future. It provides a management summary of the current state of money market mutual fund regulation, its risks, and the next steps for the regulator. \n \nA qualitative study based on an extensive literature review and three semi-structured interviews was conducted. The expert opinions were gathered between December 10, 2023 and January 7, 2024. Findings were analysed using a comprehensive seven-step process for conducting, analysing, and reporting semi-structured interview data. \n \nThe results show that liquidity concerns, such as the liquidity mismatch, in money market mutual funds impact the financial stability of the Canadian economy through its connection with the traditional banking sector. However, the small size of MMMFs in Canada (0,009 % of financial system assets in 2021) means that they do not pose a significant threat to financial stability currently. \n \nThe study has found that current liquidity regulation for Canadian banks, such as the Basel framework, still has gaps. The author recommends professionals expect changes to the Canadian liquidity regulation landscape in the next years. Moreover, liquidity regulation for MMMFs in the form of securities regulation is judged to be sufficient. \n \nConsequently, the thesis has found that it is not necessary to place MMMFs under prudential liquidity regulation as of now. Instead, the author recommends that regulators increase transparency in the sector and for more researchers to focus on understanding the different types of Canadian NBFIs, as well as their uniqueness compared to the US and European markets. \n \nOverall, the author found that while liquidity in MMMFs can influence the Canadian economy through its connection with the traditional banking sector, due to their insignificant size and sufficient existing regulation, no additional prudential liquidity regulation is necessary. \n \nThe thesis gives recommendations for the commissioning company to expect changes in prudential liquidity regulation in the coming years and to increase their efforts in understanding the NBFI sector more intimately, to defend their position as the market leader.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,016 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».