Mental health crisis care for children and young people
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background There has been a sharp increase in mental health problems experienced by children and young people. Prior to the pandemic, one in eight 5-19 year olds in England had a probable mental disorder. In 2020, amongst 5-16 year olds this figure had risen to one in six. Amongst those with a mental health difficulty, almost half of older teenagers and a quarter of 11-16 year olds report having self-harmed or attempted suicide. In this context, services for young people in crisis are a UK priority, and provision is expanding. However, very little research into crisis services for young people has been undertaken. Aims This project is answering the question, ‘How are mental health crisis responses for children and young people up to the age of 25 sustained, experienced and integrated within their local systems of services’? Methods In work package (WP) 1, survey methods are being used to gather data on NHS, local authority, education and third sector approaches to the implementation and organisation of crisis care for children and young people across England and Wales. In WP2, qualitative methods underpinned by commitments to the use of normalisation process theory are being used to generate data on how services are organised, sustained, experienced and integrated in eight contrasting case studies. In WP3, findings from each case study will be compared and contrasted, and then synthesised to inform actionable lessons for policy and services. Results Our WP1 survey opened at the end of January 2023, with approaching 100 responses received from individual services by the middle of May 2023. WP2 fieldwork is scheduled to commence in summer 2023. This concurrent session opens with an introduction to our project, and summarises progress and findings to date. Further, comprehensive, findings will be presented at future MHNR conferences as the larger project progresses. Discussions/conclusions This project is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (Grant Reference Number 151811). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Reading Bennett C., Hannigan B., Elliott M., Elliott M., Evans N., Fraser C., Hails E., Jones A., McMillan I., Pryjmachuk S., Sawle L. and Vaughan R. (2023) Crisis care for children and young people with mental health problems: national mapping, models of delivery, sustainability and experience (CAMH-Crisis2). A study protocol. NIHR Open Research 3 (22) https://dx.doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13414.1 Evans N., Edwards D., Carrier J., Elliott M., Gillen E., Hannigan B., Lane R., Williams L. (2023) Mental health crisis care for children and young people aged 5 to 25 years: the CAMH-Crisis evidence synthesis. Health and Social Care Delivery Research 11 (3) http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/BPPT3407
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».