MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7011732930

A new approach to neutron spectrometry with multi-element scintillators

2014· dissertation· en· W7011732930 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

Revuee-scholar@UOIT (University of Ontario Institute of Technology) · 2014
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiquePhysics and Engineering Research Articles
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDosimetryNeutronRadiation protectionNuclear powerIonizing radiationNeutron detectionScintillatorRadiation monitoringRadiation
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The combined effects of the nuclear industrial renaissance, the events of 9/11, and the Fukushima disaster have had a significant impact on the research and development of radiation detection instrumentation. Notably, there is ample worldwide scientific research effort into a better understanding of the material properties and nuclear interactions with a view to support the improvement of radiation detection and measurement. These improvements are spurred by the heightened security requirements that entail the monitoring of contraband material including explosives in transit, and the need to enhance occupational safety as well as environmental radiation protection in respect to nuclear power generation. Moreover, the regulatory authorities require routinely employed radiation detection and measuring devices in nuclear installations to meet the revised standard specifications in terms of their design and performance.\nCurrently, there is no neutron dosimeter/spectrometer that can meet the requirements in terms of size and performance. In particular, the requirements for high sensitivity, spectroscopic features, and determination of operational quantities to enable radiation protection decision making have resulted in a closer examination of the basic physics of the radiation interactions in detector materials.\nNeutron dosimetry is regarded as the last frontier in radiation protection. Due to the large span of neutron energy and the strong energy dependence of the dose to fluence coefficient, neutron dosimetry requires the knowledge of the neutron spectra for any accurate neutron dose quantification. As a result, spectrometry is a precursor to determine dosimetry quantities and spectrometers are therefore vital to determine and characterize radiation fields present to individuals as they provide information about the radiation intensity and energy spectra. However, current spectrometers have many drawbacks and limitations in different aspects. From one side, fast spectrometry currently uses the scattering process on hydrogen rich materials and uses complicated unfolding techniques to extract the energy spectra. From another side, neutron fields are inherently mixed with a gamma component and therefore, it is paramount to distinguish each component since their contribution to the dose equivalent is weighted differently. More specifically, the challenge becomes more profound with neutrons in the energy range between 10 keV and few MeV. These challenges are mainly due to:\n??? The drastic change in the dose-to-fluence conversion coefficient that increases by a factor of 40;\n??? The low sensitivity of the neutron sensors used in neutron spectroscopy (low cross section);\n??? The poor resolution of the detectors, which makes accurate neutron spectrometry difficult to achieve.\nHowever, by exploiting new developments and high sensitivity scintillators, in this thesis, a new approach has been adopted using different nuclear reaction processes with different contents of scintillating material. More specifically, two nuclear reactions, i.e. (n,??) and (n,p), on two different elements have been used to carry out neutron spectrometry.\nIn addition, this thesis aims to investigate the spectrometric properties of scintillating materials as a first step to establish a platform for developing a neutron spectrometer/dosimeter.\nIn terms of methodology, the thesis has taken an empirical approach in studying potential sensors that can be used for neutron spectrometry. Four scintillators have been explored and studied. Each scintillator corresponds to a particular energy region. The first part of the thesis consists of extensive Monte Carlo calculations to optimize the sensor???s isotope contents, while the second part consists of conducting a series of experiments using three main facilities, namely an AmBe source of 120 mCi, a neutron generator of 2.5 MeV neutrons at the University of Ontario Institute of Technology, a KN Van De Graaff accelerator at McMaster University, and gamma ray sources with different energies. All sensors have been used in conjunction with a miniature data acquisition system that consists of a multi-channel analyzer, mounted on a photomultiplier, and controlled by software to operate, control and analyze the output data. The time characteristics of the output pulse, such as integration time and rising time, have been optimized for each sensor.\nThe thesis presents a thorough literature review, a comprehensive methodology of the study, a description of the used facilities and the results of the simulation data with four different sensors along with the experimental work carried out at the aforementioned facilities. The response functions of each scintillator to a given radiation type and energy has been analyzed and discussed. Furthermore, the sensor???s potential for use in neutron spectrometry/dosimetry has been assessed for future work.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,931
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,195
Écart entre enseignants0,186 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuee-scholar@UOIT (University of Ontario Institute of Technology)Même sujetPhysics and Engineering Research ArticlesTravaux en français237 207