“Nipping crime in the bud”: local magistracy and the criminalisation of juveniles in Staffordshire and Shropshire c.1810-c1860.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thesis examines the criminalisation of juveniles in two neighbouring English counties – Staffordshire and Shropshire – between circa 1810 and 1860. It builds on the investigations of Peter King and Heather Shore to offer a new understanding of how juvenile behaviour and childhood were redefined in the nineteenth century and how toleration of once minor acts of misbehaviour diminished when fears surrounding idle youths intensified as society was transformed by urbanisation and industrialisation. It reappraises explanations behind the seemingly growing numbers of committals found in each county and the role of magistrates in creating this result, their self-awareness of their role and their efforts to find alternative penal regimes more suitable for a subsection of vulnerable criminals. Underutilised newspaper records of impassioned Quarter Session debates are used to illuminate the often-dry reporting of official committee records and to reveal the motivations and different opinions held by men who are often erroneously portrayed in previous histories as a homogenous entity shaped by desires of control and paternalism. Combining cross-referenced official court documents, census records, and colonial transportation logs allows a closer picture of the juveniles themselves to be uncovered – including their experiences in Tasmania – and fleshes out the criminal biographies of individuals that are otherwise obscured in official court documentation or anonymously represented in statistics in classical historical approaches. This thesis offers quantitative research alongside new perspectives with which to measure the rhetoric of the magistrates in charge of juvenile justice. Utilising micro-historical methods of record linkage provides a deep picture of individual juvenile criminals and allows their criminal associations to be reconstructed. It critiques the accuracy of the ruling magistrates’ assumptions about juvenile criminals and assesses the reasons behind decisions to alter the course of juvenile punishment in mid-Victorian England. The actions of the most impassioned magistrates exacerbated the numbers of juveniles committed to gaols and, as local justice was largely overseen by these men, it is only through local investigation that the move towards reform and reclamation in the mid-century can be fully understood. This thesis analyses the mechanisms behind juvenile criminalisation during the nineteenth century and the role of the local magistracy through a multi-perspective analysis that combines both traditional and novel methods of historical study.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,018 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».