Networked governance : China's changing approach to transboundary environmental management
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
the Secretary General of the United Nations, Ban Ki-moon, argued that environmental change is increasing in pace and intensity, and the contemporary assault against the global environmental could risk undermining international peace and security.Most importantly, he asserted that "protecting the global environment is largely beyond the capacity of individual countries'."Whether the challenge was climate change, land degradation, water shortage or loss of biodiversity, Ban argued that sovereign approaches to transboundary environmental management and governance are ineffective; and therefore, only an international networked response could be successful.As China continues to open towards the world as a rising global superpower, her ability to influence global environmental politics is taking on an important new role.Therefore the Secretary General's recent call to fundamentally alter how the international community addresses global environmental threats, although not aimed at any one state, is a de facto invitation to better engage China.China faces serious environmental challenges and increasingly has begun to export these problems to other nations.Unfortunately, China, like most other economically powerful countries, while 'For additional information refer to: http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2007/sgsm 10865.doc.htm' Transnational civil society refers to self-organized advocacy groups that undertake voluntary collection action across state borders in pursuit of what they deem the wider public interest.A transnational advocacy network are border-less interactions among civil society actors that seek to not only influence policy, but also transform the nature of political debate.This is discussed in detail later in this chapter.quite successful in establishing and strengthening environmental linkages with China.This is partially because the program is a non-binding, soft law initiative facilitated by a multilateral organization that does not entail specific compliance requirementsall attractive features to the Chinese state.In sum, it was apparent that a variety of non-state actors, including domestic Chinese non-state environmental groups, international non-governmental organizations, transnational advocacy networks, and multilateral organizations, were all responsible for exerting increasing influence involving China's environmental footprint. Key Assumptions and Research QuestionChina is increasingly integrated and influential in the Mekong Region.Networks of political, social and economic interactions composed of and facilitated by both state and non-state actors are increasing in both number and intensity, while the government, even in a one-party state such as China, has become more horizontally integrated with regional processes.In these settings, the government seems to be slowly relinquishing its role of supreme decision maker.The region is composed of a complex web of interorganizational networks that are reaching out, formally and informally, to China's environmental decision-makers at both the provincial and central levels.I assume that these networks are exerting increasing 'extra-bureaucratic' influence over China's policy and decision-making processes and thereby contributing to the changing nature of environmental governance in the region.For instance, the unitary power of the nationstate system is slowly disaggregating, while simultaneously, the influence of non-state actors inside and outside of China is growing.This is responsible for shifting the " All of these cases are discussed in detail in later chapters.12 China released a new White Paper entitled "China's Peaceful Development Road" on 22 December 2005 emphasizing it will maintain collaborative relations with other states and prioritizes mutual benefit and 'win-win' cooperation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».