MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7014330491

Overview of the Functions and Organisation of the International Hydrographic Bureau

2010· article· en· W7014330491 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueMaritime Navigation and Safety
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOfficerNavyHydrographyHydrographic surveyService (business)ArcticNautical chartThe arctic
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

An overview of the IHO and its role and programmes will be presented. In particular, how the IHO works, who belongs, what they do – and what they can’t do. Also to be discussed will be how industry is involved both as stakeholders and participants. A number of current issues will be covered, including S-100 and the establishment of its supporting ISO-conformant registry, e-Navigation, and Marine Spatial Data Infrastructures. Presenter Bio Captain Robert Ward was born in England and joined the Royal Australian Navy in 1983 after 13 years service in the british Royal Navy. As a seaman officer and hydrographer he has served both afloat and ashore in various appointments associated with nautical chart making and surveying. Captain Ward has qualified as a chartered hydrographic surveyor. During a naval career of 37 years, over 20 of which were spent in ships, he was engaged in numerous hydrographic and oceanographic surveys around the world; including the Atlantic, Pacific and Indian Oceans, the Mediterranean, and in the Arctic and Antarctic. In addition he conducted many detailed coastal and harbour surveys around the UK, Australia, and the islands of the South West Pacific. Captain Ward has served in various capacities in British and Australian Navy surveying ships. Notable sea postings included Officer-in-Charge of the RAN Detached Survey Unit, Executive Officer of the oceanographic research vessel HMAS COOK and Commanding Officer of HMAS MORESBY, surveying ship. He also served for a short time as a deck officer in the british merchant navy. Ashore, his experience has included strategic planning, capability development, project management, commercial support programs, hydrographic training both in the UK and as Officer-in-Charge of the Royal Australian Navy Hydrographic School, personnel management, chart data licensing and hydrographic data copyright. Captain Ward has a long history of involvement in national and international hydrographic relations with particular emphasis on the implementation and development of policies associated with electronic chart navigation and digital hydrographic data. He has wide experience of the IHO, IMO and related inter-governmental organisations dealing with navigation safety and standards. He has been instrumental in the implementation of both military and commercial electronic charting standards worldwide, serving on a number of committees and working groups including as Chairman of the IHO CHRIS, the then technical steering committee of the International Hydrographic Organization. In September 2007 Captain Ward assumed his position as one of the three co-Directors at the International Hydrographic Bureau, in Monaco. His principal responsibility is the administration of the technical program of the International Hydrographic Organization. In addition, he is the Director assigned to the following Regional Hydrographic Commissions: Baltic, Canada and the US, East Asia, Nordic, and the South West Pacific. Captain Ward was the Deputy Hydrographer of Australia prior to his retirement from the Navy in 2007.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,602
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,720

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,191
Écart entre enseignants0,176 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester)Même sujetMaritime Navigation and SafetyTravaux en français237 207