Potential for an improved pesticide regulatory system in Mexico
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Hazards arising from an increase in the use of pesticides in Mexico have stimulated the development of a complex pesticide regulatory system, comprising inter-institutional participation of four governmental Secretariats.However, because this arrangement has not been reformed, despite several analytical reviews, since its creation almost 20 years ago and evidence of environmental and health damage by pesticides has continued to increase there is concern about its effectiveness.This thesis focuses on the proposal to improve the regulatory system for pesticides in Mexico.The regulation is covered by a patchwork of laws which are not integrated into a single structure.The analysis of the current system showed few gaps in the legal framework but its implementation and enforcement have been slow and difficult.The narrow achievement of the objectives of the Inter-Secretarial Commission for the Control of the Processing and Use of Pesticides, Fertilizers and Toxic Substances (CICOPLAFEST), as a coordinating body of the regulation of pesticides and other hazardous substances, also denotes clear organisational and administrative limitations.Considering the political, administrative and economic context of Mexico and the main objectives of pesticide stakeholders, the leadership of the Health Secretariat (SSA) on pesticide control through the concentration of the main regulatory activities in the Federal Commission for the Protection against Health Risks (COFEPRIS), the creation of an exclusive law for pesticides and the presence of a reformed CICOPLAFEST were found to be the way to improve the regulatory system most appropriately within the range of objectives identified and defined.This work supports the view that legislation is the short-term solution to the range of pesticide problems; hence the new law would provide strong foundations and clarity to the regulation of pesticides.It is also considered that institutional factors can have a decisive influence to promote an intensive use of pesticides; thus it is expected that the leadership of SSA would provide a balance in the public policies as the current subsidy to pesticides is a clear incongruence with policies on protection of human health and the environment.Along with these strategies other initiatives are supported, such as the strengthening of training and education, closer contact with the scientific community, encouragement of the use of less toxic pesticides, among others, which would constitute the long term solution to pesticide problems.A set of indicators is also proposed to measure the adequacy or inadequacy of this proposal, which would provide the basis for a continue improvement.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».