The Principle of Integration of the Economic, Social and Environmental Dimensions: Analysis of its Recognition and Application in International Watercourse Cooperation Regimes
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
[eng] While sustainable development is a broad objective that expresses an idea of intergenerational justice, on a more practical level, it also implies the creation of linkages between sectors and regimes on the basis of concrete measures and instruments. The principle of integration – one of the widely accepted principles on which sustainable development is based – aims to ensure that economic, social and environmental dimensions are given due consideration so that development-related activities are carried out in a sustainable manner. However, despite its relevance as a key element of sustainable development, the principle of integration remains largely uncharacterised, not only in terms of its recognition as a rule of international law but also in terms of the mechanisms through which it is implemented by the States. This research aims to contribute to discussion of the recognition and application of the principle of integration of the economic, social and environmental dimensions by focusing on the specific domain of the law of international watercourses. As the object of study is of a practical nature and focuses on the development and application of the norm, crucial methodological support is provided by the use of study cases. A group of nine international basins have been analysed, on the basis that the characteristics of their cooperation regimes make them particularly valuable for assessing the principle of integration. The basins are those of the Mekong River, Danube River, Dniester River, Sava River, Senegal River, Volta River, Niger basin, Lake Chad, and the combined regime for the watercourses shared by Canada and the United States of America. The study is structured in four chapters. Chapter 1 conceptualises and determines the legal nature and content of the principle of integration and attempts to define the legal contours of this obligation under international law from the theory of sources. Chapter 2 focuses on the field of international watercourse law, determining first the extent to which the principle of integration must govern cooperation on international watercourses and second whether the legal framework established by international watercourse law is sufficiently broad to allow the principle of integration to be applied. The third and fourth chapters analyse the cooperation regimes of a set of international watercourses. Specifically, Chapter 3 analyses how legal integration is operationalised in these cooperation frameworks related to international watercourses. Chapter 4 addresses the issue of institutional integration. After defining what institutional integration entails at a theoretical level, it analyses the practices and instruments that international river basin organisations undertake to operationalise this form of integration. This analysis leads to the conclusion that international watercourse cooperation mechanisms enabling the integration of the economic, social and environmental dimensions are generally under-utilised and represent an opportunity to more effectively pursue sustainable development. It also shows that integration currently relies to a great extent on institutional integration mechanisms, while legal integration remains largely unused and offers the greatest potential for better recognition and application of the principle of integration.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».