The regolith expression of gold mineralisation in the Central Gawler Craton, South Australia: examples from the Tunkillia Gold Prospect and the surrounding region
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Transported and typically weathered material that covers much of Australia presents a challenge to the successful application of surficial geochemical exploration methods. The Gawler Craton of South Australia is host to world-class IOCG-U style (viz. Olympic Dam and Prominent Hill) and Au (Challenger) deposits. Exploration in this region is a challenging enterprise, where 90% of the crystalline basement is under sedimentary cover. Geochemical sampling of regolith materials, such as pedogenic carbonate, has been attempted across the Gawler Craton to target buried mineralisation. However, results have been equivocal because the calcrete is potentially transported, poorly developed, or absent. Plant biogeochemistry has also emerged as a tool for mineral exploration, as it has been attributed to the discovery of mineralisation in regional-scale surveys in Canada, however, Australian applications have been limited. The Tunkillia Au Prospect (Mungana Goldmines Ltd.), in the central Gawler Craton, was first recognised on a 50 km² area of elevated Au-in-calcrete (> 10 ppb). The Prospect has a challenging exploration context: pervasive sand dunes and leached saprolite cover mineralisation that is at depths greater than 50 m. Gold content in the surface materials does not always represent underlying mineralisation, and this has misled previous exploration targeting in the area. In this thesis I show that a detailed analysis of the transported and residual regolith in three profiles to a depth of 50 m indicates that despite deep weathering, geochemical and mineralogical indicators of mineralisation are retained. The saprolite is predominantly kaolinite with relic feldspar in each of the profiles. White mica (muscovite and phengite) is abundant in the saprolite from the site of main mineralisation (Area-223). The white mica is distinguished using Hylogger™ and/or X-ray diffraction, and is characterised by Rb concentrations > 175 ppm using portable XRF instruments. Results from biogeochemical and calcrete sampling conducted across parts of the Tunkillia Au Prospect are interpreted in the context of landscape setting. Plant and calcrete Au results are similar at the prospect scale that suggests that the plants are accessing the Au from calcrete. The Au-in-calcrete anomaly is controlled by palaeo-drainage. Gold within calcrete is restricted to detrital sand pods, indicating the Au is transported within sediments from an upslope source. Silver and Te in plant leaves also indicate upslope mineralisation, highlighting areas of the Prospect that warrant further investigation. Biogeochemical pathfinders of metre-scale mineralised veins in the Glenloth and Earea Dam goldfields west of Lake Harris I found were Au, Ag, Bi, Cu, Sn, Te and U. Biogeochemical sampling was implemented in regional surveys (20 – 200 km²) alongside regolith geochemical sampling. Calcrete development is generally irregular, whereas plant samples could be collected at regular intervals. Biogeochemical sampling was able to delineate underlying geology, particularly the Gawler Range Volcanics (high Pb) and Deception Hill basalt (high Re). Biogeochemical results were also found to be influenced by landscape processes such as mechanical and hydromorphic element mobility along drainage and aeolian contamination in open chenopod shrublands and near unsealed roads.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».