Relaxation therapy for those with cancer : a grounded theory
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Mind-body approaches have been used to target stress and anxiety associated with a diagnosis of cancer.A specific on-going, open, relaxation mind-body group offered through Cancer Care Manitoba in V/innipeg MB experientially taught patients three mind-body approaches; (a) progressive muscle relaxation, (b) guided imagery and visualization and (c) suggestions and affirmations.Ten participants and fow facilitators were interviewed.Interviews focused on three topics; (a) the role the group played in the participants' lives and their cancer experience, (b) what home practice looked like for participants, and (c) how participants were able to apply the approaches to spontaneous situations.The interviews were coded and analyzed according to grounded theory methodology.A theory developed which found that when three conditions were present, participants used the approaches the most frequently and regularly to cope with cancer related situations, as well as every day stressful events.The three conditions were (a) presence of stress and anxiety producing situations, (b) external motivation, and (c) personal motivation.However, participants continued to use modif,red versions of the approaches long after they f,rnished cancer treatment and stopped attending the mindbody group.Those with minimal exposure to the approaches and as well as those who had not attended the group in up to 5 years continued to use the approaches in some fashion.Information from the facilitator interviews was not included in this coding, however did substantiate findings to some degree.state of mind of the person and treated through physical and mental interventions (Lewis& Lewis, 1972).In the second half of the 19th century, the germ theory of disease took precedence in the medical field, placing more emphasis on the discovery of microorganisms that cause disease (Lewis & Lewis, 1972).The emotional aspect of physical ailments took a back seat to the physiological discoveries that were being made in that era.Compartmentalization of the mind and body into many systems allowed for study of the body in minute detail but, at the same time, the individual personality was ignored and thought to be of little influence or consequence in treatment (Loscalzo & Zabon,1996).In recent years, there has been a move to mend this split of the mind and body and view the person in totality, attending to all psychological, social, spiritual, and physical consequences of a diagnosis (Loscalzo &. Zabora, 1996).There is relevant literature relating to the effectiveness of widely used psychosocial interventions for those with cancer.Overall, individuals with cancer have shown improvements in distress and anxiety levels due to psychosocial interventions (Andrykowski & Manne, 2006).There is a growing body of literature focusing on Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction, a program based on intensive, daily teaching and practice of body scan meditation, sitting meditation and mindful hatha yoga, discussions of stress and coping and a home practice component (Kabit-Zirn 1985; Kabit-Zinn, Massion, Hebert, & Rosenbaum, 1998).Introducing this program to individuals with cancer has shown positive and long term effects on managing stress (Carlson et al., 200I Carlson, Speca,
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,016 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».