Responses to gentrification, displacement, and the loss of low end of market (LEM) rental housing in the City of Toronto: From creating to contesting displaceability
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Government efforts to respond to the current crisis in housing affordability have centred on efforts to create new supply with comparatively little attention to preservation of existing affordable, or Low End of Market (LEM), rental housing in the private market. Decades of state policies that have prioritized developer and real estate interests over tenant rights and protections have facilitated various forms of gentrification resulting in widespread erosion of affordability and losses of LEM rental housing leading to displacement of low-income tenants. \nEfforts to measure and define these losses have been challenged by a lack of data but there is evidence that they are outstripping gains in housing affordability made by government housing strategies. \nThis portfolio of work explores the loss of LEM housing and displacement in the City of Toronto including the ways in which these losses are occurring, the role of state policy in both facilitating and framing the responses to these losses, and efforts by the third sector to contest them. A key element of this exploration is the role of data in these responses. The first section of the portfolio is a review of state policy, both historical and current, and how they have shaped new forms of gentrification and displacement and what are the influences on policy preference formation in the area of housing supply. The role of data is considered in relation to understanding housing options available to the low-income renter, policy and program development and supporting advocacy for the preservation of affordable housing and efforts to contest displacement. \nThe second section mixes both quantitative and qualitative methods to review how the loss of LEM housing is being tracked in the City of Toronto and how the impact of the related displacement is being responded to and contested. A collection of datasets documenting both physical and economic losses and displacement responses are presented and analyzed accompanied by case studies of three multi-tenant housing sites of displacement involving interviews with former tenants, advocates and agency staff involved. The implications of the findings on program and policy development and community practice to preserve affordable housing and contest displacement are discussed in this section’s conclusion. \nThe final section outlines a project funded by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) Housing Supply Challenge to develop a data solution with the capacity to monitor the iv supply and location of LEM rental housing in urban areas that could inform and support preservation-based approaches to housing supply decisions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».