Stereotypes and microaggressions against Black African international students in U.S. higher education institutions
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction \n \nThis paper examines extant literature on stereotypes and microaggressions against Black African international students in U.S. postsecondary education institutions. We explore the lived experiences of Black African international students studying at various U.S. higher education institutions for patterns of stereotypes and microaggressions. \n \nThe term Black Africans refers to people from Western, Eastern, Southern (excluding "White" South Africans), and Central parts of Africa, who have darker skin pigmentation. This contrasts with North Africans, who for the most part have lighter skin pigmentation and may pass for "White," depending on their phenotypical features/variations. In fact, in political and academic discourses, North Africa is often associated with the Middle East under the broad term MENA, an abridgment of Middle East and North Africa (Amrani, 2015). \n \nPreliminary Literature Review \nMost studies that look at race-related issues vis-a-vis international student experiences classify participants by national/continental representations, depending on the research's foci. For example, in a study that examined the making of the meaning of race and racialization by international graduate students, Lewis (2013) featured participants from England, Brazil, Nigeria, China, and Norway, representing Europe, South America, Africa, Asia, and Europe respectively. Lee and Rice's (2007) study analyzed the experiences of twenty-four international students from India, East Asia, Africa, Europe, Latin America, the Gulf Region, Canada and New Zealand. Hanassab's (2006) study, which assessed "the experiences of international students…[on] perceived discrimination" (p. 157) in U.S. postsecondary institutions, sampled participants from Asia, Europe, Canada, Southeast Asia, the Americas, Africa, the Middle East, and Oceania. \n \nOther studies employ a domestic v. international student perspective, homogenizing the experiences of international students. Although this blanket approach has contributed to understanding the racialized experiences of international students in U.S postsecondary institutions, it offers little insights into the dynamics of stereotypes and microaggressions among Black international students, who may experience race-related stress because of the intersectionality of their identity. For example, a Black male, African international student who combines at least two minoritized identities: "Black" and "African international student." The apparent aspect of this student's identity that is seen by others is the color of his skin. So, without hearing his non-"American" accent, he may be perceived as African American and become a target of racialized oppression. \n \nResearch Questions and Methods \nWe will utilize a purposive sampling technique, comprising five Black African international graduate students-from Ghana and Nigeria-from three U.S. institutions, including University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Texas Tech University, and Bowling Green State University. Some of the survey questions include, but not limited to: \no Have you personally experienced stereotypes and microaggressions in the U.S.? \no Do you think stereotypes and microaggressions against a Black female, international student may be amplified because of the color of her skin? \no Do you think Black international students may face stereotypes and microaggressions that "White" international students (from Europe and Canada) studying in the U.S. may not face? \n \nEmerging Themes \nExclusion: dearth of literature examining the lived experiences of Black African international students. Studies on racial microaggressions against minoritized groups on U.S. campuses seldom include Black African international students. \n \nPerceived language and academic abilities: preliminary review of extant literature suggests that Black African international students face language and race-based microaggressions that White international students from the UK, Australia, and Canada do not face. \n \nIntersectionality of Identity: Race plays a role in Black African international students' experiences of stereotypes and microaggression in the U.S. For example, stereotypes and microaggressions against a Black female, international student may be amplified because of the color of her skin. \n \nAs the search for a better understanding on this issue continues, we will utilize preliminary findings from our surveys to organize semi-structured interviews and focus groups, and carry out further data analysis. Implicitly construed as one of the aims of the 2018 CIES conference is the need "to expand our awareness of the voices, actors and knowledge producers that have historically been marginalized in educational research and institutions." For many Black African international students, being "Black" held no racial significance until they came to the U.S. Lewis suggest that "one key aspect of international student identities that is likely to become complicated during their here [in the United States] is their racial identity" (2013, p. 60). So, central to this "awareness," is the importance of critically challenging-to disrupt-the systems of institutionalized marginalization against Black international students, which undermine their agency in the process of scholastic production and representation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».