Spinal opioid-adrenergic analgesic interactions: mechanistic insights on the role of the delta opioid and the alpha2A adrenergic receptors
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Opioid and α2-adrenergic receptor (α2AR) ligands are both analgesic when administered spinally and show a clinically beneficial synergistic interaction in the treatment of pain when co-administered. The µ- and δ-opioid receptors (MOR and DOR respectively) and the α2AARs have been shown to be capable of mediating opioid-adrenergic synergistic interactions. The development of new therapeutic approaches that exploit the combination of opioids and α2AR agonists is currently hindered by limited mechanistic knowledge on how these drugs interact at the spinal level. It is generally accepted that MOR mediates morphine antinociception. However, since morphine-related interactions between MOR and DOR have been reported at the spinal level, the role of DOR in spinal morphine antinociception requires further evaluation. Therefore, the First Aim of this thesis was to investigate the role of DOR in the antinociceptive effect of morphine and other opioids at the spinal level. Using the hot water tail flick assay, we observed that morphine was equally potent, but less effective in DOR-knockout (KO) mice compared to wild type (WT) mice. On the other hand, the efficacy of the DOR-selective agonists DeltII and SNC80 was maintained in DOR-KO mice. This study therefore suggests that 1) DOR is necessary to obtain full spinal morphine antinociceptive efficacy and 2) that DOR agonists are not selective in the tail flick assay. These observations from Aim 1 raised two important questions: 1) Is DOR necessary to produce a morphine synergistic interaction with an α2AR agonist? 2) Is DOR activation by DOR agonists sufficient to obtain a synergistic interaction with an α2AR agonist? Thus, the Second Aim of this thesis was to determine whether DOR activation is sufficient and necessary to mediate opioid-adrenergic synergistic interactions in the spinal cord. The absence of DeltII antinociception in DOR-KO mice confirmed its selectivity in the substance P behavioral assay, therefore validating the choice of this assay. Opioid-adrenergic drug interactions were evaluated following spinal co-administration of the α2AR agonist clonidine with DeltII, morphine or DAMGO in WT and DOR-KO mice. Our results showed that DeltII+clonidine synergy is DOR-dependent, morphine+clonidine synergy is not DOR-dependent and DAMGO+clonidine do not interact synergistically. These findings confirm that DOR activation is sufficient but not necessary for synergy with α2AR agonists.The Third Aim of this thesis was to investigate the role of α2AAR in spinal opioid-adrenergic synergy and opioid antinociception. We first confirmed that the α2AAR mediates the synergistic interaction between clonidine and either morphine or DeltII. We also observed a potentiation of spinal morphine and spinal DeltII-mediated antinociception in α2AAR-KO mice compared to WT mice; this potentiation could not be attributed to changes in the expression of opioid receptors, to alterations in opioid ligand binding properties or to enhanced noradrenergic tone in the spinal cord. Together, these findings led us to propose a model whereby the α2AAR allosterically modulates spinal opioid receptors in an activation state-dependent manner. These studies improve our understanding of the interaction between α2-adrenergic and opioid drugs at the spinal level, which could lead to new the development of better pharmacological treatments for pain management.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».