Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
JUST because a house is powered by the sun doesn't mean it has to sacrifice style or comfort in the name of conservation.That's the lesson of the 2005 Solar Decathlon, a competition among 18 teams from universities in the United States, Puerto Rico, Canada and Spain.These students -primarily from their schools' architecture and engineering programs -have set up a solar subdivision between the Capitol and the Washington Monument, with homes designed to produce as much or more energy than they use.Each of the 500-to 800-square-foot buildings is being judged in 10 categories, includi ng power generation for heating, cooling, lights and appliances; production of hot water; architecture and general livability.In the first round of judging, for architecture and dwelling, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo placed second in both categories behind Virginia Pol ytechnic Institute and State University.Architectural judge Ken Wilson described the winning houses as modern and machine-like with an emphasis on the functional."We liked just how simple and clean both these homes were," Wilson said."One assumes that the design has to be sacrificed because of the environmental factors, but these two possessed very sophisticated designs."Judges will select the winner based on the home's energy efficiency and its blend of aesthetics and modern conveniences."These show that you don't have to sacrifice modern conveniences for conservation," said Austin Quig-Hartman, a member of the Cal Poly team and a fifth-year engineering student."I'm excited because I think that within our lifetimes there is going to be the shift to solar energy when we run out of oil," he said.U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel W. Bodman, whose department is the main sponsor of the competition, opened the exhibit Oct. 6."These homes are helping to bring the promise of solar power to reality," he said."Every one of them is a marvel of engineering and design, and a model of creativity and innovation."This is the second Solar Decathlon; the first, in 2002, was won by a team from the University of Colorado, which is participating again this year.The third competition is scheduled for 2007.This year's participants submitted proposals and plans to the Energy Department in the spring of 2003.The 18 finalists, which included eight schools from the first competition, were given a $5,000 stipend to begin work on their projects.Since then, they have been concentrating on the design and construction of their homes.The Cal Poly team, for example, embarked on fundraising and received in-kind donations of thousands of dollars' worth of goods and services -including the home's steel framework, energy-saving appliances, bamboo flooring (to avoid the destruction of old hardwood forests) and the all-important solar roof panels and photovoltaic cells that provide the power.The school has estimated that completing the house and supporting the team members during the competition could cost as much as half a million dollars.After the teams fine-tuned their designs on their campuses -Cal Poly initially built i ts home on a softball practice field -they shipped their homes to the capital and began reassembling them Sept. 30.The houses have been open to the public for a week and are being judged daily.The results are available at www.eere.energy.gov/solar_decathlon.The winner will be announced Friday.Although the designs are based on a core list of criteria, each home has a distinct style and purpose.The students from Cal Poly
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle