Using whole genome sequencing to identify risk alleles for susceptibility to schizophrenia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Schizophrenia is a complex idiopathic neuropsychiatric illness that affects approximately 1% of the general population. Family, twin, and adoption studies indicate a high heritability and strong genetic element to the disease with first degree relatives demonstrating an increased risk of about 10% and monozygotic concordance rates as high as 50%. These values represent the probability of developing schizophrenia based on the presence of genetic components. The high heritability has led to individual studies and meta-analyses being able to produce significant evidence of linkage to specific locations, but studies that used large number of pedigrees have failed to produce statistically significant linkage results. Genome Wide Association Studies of schizophrenia have also produced similarly mixed results. One interpretation of these mixed linkage and association results is that factors such as small effect size and uncontrolled phenotypic variation require very large samples to overcome. This thesis focuses on a different interpretation: genuine genetic differences between definable subsets can mask both linkage and association, and that this problem is worsened in studies that use large samples where the entire sample is analyzed as if it were a genetically homogenous group. The work presented herein begins with linkage studies performed on 22 medium- sized Canadian pedigrees (n=304 individuals) of German or Celtic descent initially recruited if at least three subjects with schizophrenia were available for study. Association studies were conducted on an expanded sample of 30 pedigrees (n=573). Subjects in this sample have been followed for up to 20 years allowing for continued observation of diagnostic stability. We have identified linkage disequilibrium between schizophrenia and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from six discrete genomic regions located under linkage peaks within this sample. We hypothesize that SNPs that generated compelling evidence of association (PPLD|L >= 0.2) produce these scores because they either are, or are in, high LD (r 2 >= 0.8) with functional variants that increase susceptibility to schizophrenia. To that end, whole genome sequencing data from ten individuals within this study (n=10) was analyzed to generate a list of variants within 500 kb upstream and downstream of each risk SNP. A pipeline was created to determine whether or not each SNP in this list was a candidate for further analysis by assessing its LD to the risk SNPs identified by the association studies described above. SNPs determined to be candidates were then genotyped in the entire sample (n=378) so that association could be accurately assessed. Finally, association scores were compared between risk SNPs and candidate SNPs, with variants having higher PPLD|L scores than the referring SNP identified as potential functional candidates. Six SNPs from one genomic region produced higher PPLD|L scores than the referring SNP and so will replace the referring SNP as candidates for further functional analysis. These six SNPs first will be evaluated for additional candidate SNPs 500 kb up- and down-stream in order to determine the best SNP in the region according to the PPLD|L. Additional SNPs have also been identified in some of the other genomic regions that need to be assessed for LD in the full sample. The SNP or SNPs producing the strongest LD signal in each region will need to be further assessed by functional assays to determine their potential role in schizophrenia susceptibility.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».