MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7017196927

Adoption of an Innovative Water Management System in Eastern Canada

2022· dissertation· en· W7017196927 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2022
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueComputational Physics and Python Applications
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLife-cycle assessmentDrainageClimate changeAgricultureEutrophicationLand useEnvironmental impact assessmentIrrigationAgricultural productivityLand management
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Water table management through controlled tile drainage and subsurface-irrigation (CDSI), retrofitting to conventional tile drainage, have been developed as beneficial water management practices (BWMPs) in eastern Canada. The implementation of the BWMPs aims to reduce adverse environmental impacts of irrigation and drainage and thus sustain agroecosystem services and crop productivity. Therefore, based on the underlying socio-economic benefits of retrofitting conventional tile drainage to BWMPs, farmers’ voluntary adoption of these agroecological beneficial technologies has been encouraged to improve agricultural water management and the agri-environment.
\n
\nSince an environmental profile of BWMPs is a prerequisite to understanding their socio- economic benefits, a life cycle assessment was conducted to assess the environmental impacts of CDSI on continuous corn production for the 2014 and 2015 growing seasons at St-Emmanuel, south-western Quebec, compared to the free drainage (FD) baseline scenario. Following the standard life cycle assessment process, inventory flows of corn production with CDSI and FD were developed using biophysical data from field experiments and public databases. Then, seven environmental categories were analyzed to compare the environmental impacts of corn production with CDSI and FD: (1) land use, (2) climate change, (3) eutrophication potential, (4) acidification potential, (5) human toxicity, (6) terrestrial ecotoxicity, and (7) freshwater ecotoxicity. As a result, the corn production system with CDSI suggested better environmental performances in most assessed impact categories than FD, including land use, climate change, eutrophication potential, human toxicity, terrestrial ecotoxicity, and freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity. However, it is worth noting that the high nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions in 2014 may increase the risks of climate change and acidification impacts from the implementation of CDSI. In conclusion, there exist comprehensive environmental benefits of implementing CDSI, particularly in improving water quality. However, potential synergy and tradeoffs of climate change, eutrophication, and acidification impacts from the implementation of CDSI, especially under different climatic conditions, should be investigated to stable the performance of the technology.
\n
\nThe third paper employed the conceptual framework of co-benefits in climate change mitigation to quantitatively evaluate the co-benefits of implementing BWMPs. The evaluation method consists of financial analysis and life cycle assessment to measure the economic return and environmental benefits of investing in CDSI compared with the Base technology of conventional free drainage system. Based on the field experiments conducted on a continuous corn production system for the 2014 and 2015 growing seasons in St-Emmanuel, Quebec, co-benefits were estimated as the sum of the differences in net present value and the reduction in environmental costs between BWMPs and Base technology. As a result, the assessed co-benefits of implementing BWMPs compared to Base technology were around $129.42 - $142.03 per hectare under median-level environmental prices; $158.29 - $231.74 per hectare under upper-level environmental prices. The positive co-benefits illustrate the additional benefits of implementing BWMPs in addition to GHG emission mitigation. Accordingly, BWMPs can be developed and adopted as farm-level adaptation practices to climate change.
\n
\nNext, based on a conceptual framework for environmental-economic decision-making with multi-criteria analysis (MCDA), GIS-based MCDA was used to analyze and estimate the decision-making of implementing beneficial water management practices (BWMPs) in Ontario, Canada. Decision-making from private and public perspectives was concerned with diverse economic and environmental priorities in this study. The results included a farm- scale case study and an extended regional-scale decision map of BWMPs implementation. Specifically, in the research farm case study, private farmers may not implement BWMPs due to their high priorities for economic criteria. In contrast, BWMPs should be selected by the public for their fairly environmental benefits to society. Likewise, the regional decision map regarding GIS-based MCDA displays that projected areas of implementing BWMPs with private and public concern differ for 22.10% and 44.38%, respectively, of Ontario 2016’s total land in crops. Conclusively, conflicted decisions from private and public perspectives regarding implementing BWMPs can inhibit the farmers’ voluntary adoption of BWMPs and the achievement of public environmental goals in agriculture. The dilemma between private and public concern suggests the rationale for evoking agri-environmental policy in grant- ing incentives to support the adoption of BWMPs, such as green payments, environmental stewardship programs and extension activities.
\n
\nPaper in chapter 5 employed agent-based modelling (ABM) to calibrate the policy-induced dynamic adoption/diffusion process of agri-environmental technology due to previous micro- level studies’ limitations of using the econometric models from the ex-post perspective and the absence of policy interventions. A framework of policy-induced agri-environmental technology was introduced with model components and implementation process based on related research regarding technology adoption and ABM. Further, results were simulated from an agent-based model given the presumed policy programs regarding the adoption of BWMPs in a case study of Essex county, Ontario, Canada. The results highlighted the dynamic adoption/diffusion process and policy evaluation to explain how ABM can support the agri- environmental policy design. Conclusively, the model provided a flexible quantitative tool to support ex-ante evaluation and design of policy regarding social-ecological systems, based on forecasting farmers’ adoption decision-making and outcomes in a future period. Lastly, potential improvements to extend the inherent farmers’ adoption behaviour algorithm, computing capability, and model validation were discussed for future research.
\n
\nThe four papers in this thesis build together an interdisciplinary case of constructing a comprehensive analytic and decision-making system for the adoption of an innovative water management system in eastern Canada. Based on the socio-economic assessment, the environmental improvements of BWMPs implementation, mainly in reducing GHG emissions and eutrophication, primarily support the adoption prospects of this innovative water management system as a climate change mitigation and adaptation measure in eastern Canada. However, the conflicting decisions on BWMPs implementation from private and public perspectives prevent farmers’ voluntary adoption of BWMPs, implying the rationale for policy instruments. Accordingly, an agent-based model was developed for predicting the policy- induced adoption process of BWMPs as a ”test-bed” tool for policy design and evaluation. Finally, this thesis recognizes the scientific knowledge and policy implications regarding the adoption of BWMPs to support agricultural sustainability in eastern Canada, particularly aiming at climate change mitigation and adaptation.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,443
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,883

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,168
Écart entre enseignants0,163 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle