Andrew Jackson fonds, 1921-2007, n.d.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Andrew Jackson was as an economist with the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) for 25 years, from 1989 to 2012. He was born in England in 1952 and moved to Canada in 1965 when his father, John Jackson, was appointed as the first Head of the Department of Geography at Brock University. In 1968 he joined the youth wing of the NDP after being influenced by Mel Swart, a family friend. Swart later became a highly respected NDP member of the Ontario Parliament. In 1970, Jackson moved to England to study at the London School of Economics, where he received a Bachelor of Science Degree in Economics and a Master of Science Degree in Political Sociology. Upon completion of his studies in 1975, he returned to Canada and enrolled in the PhD program in Political Science at the University of British Columbia. In 1979 Jackson took a job with the British Columbia NDP caucus. Five years later, he relocated to Ottawa where his wife had taken a job with the Macdonald Royal Commission. He took a job with the federal NDP caucus as part of their research team, where he focused on economic and tax issues. He left this job in 1988 to work with the labour branch of the Canadian Labour and Productivity Centre. A year later, he went to work for the Canadian Labour Congress. His roles with the CLC included Chief Economist and later Director of Social and Economic Policy. Some of the major issues he addressed included the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax; the FTA and NAFTA; regressive tax reform; cuts to Unemployment Insurance and federal transfers to the provinces; public pensions and pensions regulation; and labour market policy, including training. During his work with the CLC, Jackson continued to be a policy advisor to the NDP caucus. He was also very active with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA), writing many studies documenting adverse economic and social trends such as wealth inequality. Since his retirement, Jackson has had a regular column in the Report on Business section of the Globe and Mail, as well as being a frequent contributor to the blog of the Progressive Economics Forum. He has also written several articles and books on Canadian political and economic issues, including Work and Labour in Canada: Critical Issues (1st ed. 2005); Sick of the System: why the COVID-19 recovery must be revolutionary; and The Fire and the Ashes: rekindling democratic socialism (2021).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,143 | 0,040 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».