'“As much as I miss it… I can't bring myself to go back”: Experiences of early career registered nurses who leave nursing.'
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BackgroundThere is evidence of a nursing workforce crisis with increasing intention to leave (Royal College of Nursing, 2021), yet little is known about the experience of leaving the profession or direct nursing care. Actual nursing turnover needs further exploration (Hallaran et al., 2020; Halter 2017). Early career nurse retention is a priority due to significant investment in nurse education and the high incidence of nurse turnover in the first few years of qualification (Buchan et al., 2018; Collard et al., 2020). This study explores actual nursing turnover experience in the UK context.AimTo gain in-depth understanding of the experience of leaving nursing focusing on early career nurses who worked in the NHS and left direct care nursing, or the profession itself, within 5 years of registration as a nurse.MethodsThis qualitative study uses a narrative approach to focus on individual stories of leaving nursing to elicit in-depth first-hand experiences. Participants were recruited via social media and professional networks, for this hard-to-reach group. Phase one was carried out in January-March 2024, 8 participants had in-depth online video interviews.Results and discussionPreliminary findings in phase 1 of this study offer contextual evidence and add to current knowledge based on actual turnover experiences. Numerous complex factors shape individual narratives and shared elements can inform discussion about current nursing workforce challenges. Key findings include:Becoming a nurse: motivations to nurse; strategic career choices; nursing identity.Experiences as a nurse: dissonance between values and reality of nursing; lack of autonomy to improve care; negotiating peer support; poor mental health; high-pressure workloads; COVID experiences; incivility in practice.Leaving nursing: impact of loss of nursing identity; sense of failure; reshaping personal and professional identities.ConclusionsThis UK wide study offers insight into reasons for actual professional turnover of nurses in the NHS, of interest to policymakers, NHS leaders, and researchers.ReferencesBuchan J (2018) Policy brief: Nurse Retention. International Centre on Nurse Migration. Available at: https://www.icn.ch/sites/default/files/inline-files/2018_ICNM%20Nurse%20retention.pdfCollard SS, Scammell J, and Tee S. (2020) Closing the gap on nurse retention: A scoping review of implications for undergraduate education. Nurse Education Today. 84. 104253–104253. doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104253Hallaran AJ, Edge DS, Almost J, & Tregunno D (2020) New Registered Nurse Transition to the Workforce and Intention to Leave: Testing a Theoretical Model, Canadian Journal of Nursing Research. doi.org/10.1177/0844562120957845Halter M, Boiko O, Pelone F, Beighton C, Harris R, Gale J, Gourlay S and Drennan V (2017). The determinants and consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews. BMC Health Services Research 17. 824. doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2707-0Royal College of Nursing (2021) RCN Employment Survey 2021. Available at: https://www.rcn.org.uk/professional-development/publications/Employment-Survey-2021-uk-pub-010-075#detailTab
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle