MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7017654293

Behavioral Indicators of Ovarian Phase in the Dromedary She-camel

2014· article· en· W7017654293 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueArchivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEstrous cycleEthogramReproductionFollicular phaseReproductive cycleReproductive tractCorpus luteumOvulationLuteal phase
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In beef and dairy cattle the estrus cycle affects endocrine, ovarian, and behavioral events and detection of estrus by behavioral parameters is well assessed (Roelofs et al 2010). Female dromedary camels are seasonal breeders and induced ovulators, in which four follicular phases have been distinguished: recruitment, growth, mature and regressing (Skidmore 2011). Currently, little data has been published about estrus behavior in the she- camel. Recent rapid development in using assisted reproductive techniques to enhance dromedary reproduction makes urgent the detection of estrus in this species. The aim of this study was to relate different reproductive phases with observed behaviors which she-camels showed in presence of a male, and to identify behavioral indicators for the mature phase of estrus. Twenty-four healthy adult non-pregnant and non-lactating females were used. Two days prior to initiating the study, all received 789 μg Cloprostenol (Estrumate®, Agro-pharm Inc., Canada) intramuscularly (i.m.). Each animal was examined once a week over a three week period and was checked by manual gynecological examination, and its reproductive system was ultrasonographically scanned. Camels bearing mature preovulatory follicles (diameter >13 mm, Ismail et al 2007) were treated i.m. with 20 μg gonadorelin (Fertagyl®, Intervet, Germany) to induce ovulation, and ensure the presence of corpora lutea in the subsequent week. Immediately following examination sessions, each female was freely exposed to a restrained bull, and its behaviors recorded using a video camera. The videos were analyzed though a scan sampling ethogram (States: looking at the male; looking outside; standing; walking; searching; male interaction; lying down; Events: sniffing; interaction with the male; urination; defecation; sound emission). A score for tail position ("tail score": 1= close to the vulva, 2= horizontal, 3= vertical) and for interest in the bull ("male time score": from 1 to 5; 1=less than 20% of observation period spent near the bull; 5= more than 80%), were recorded. Dromedary females were considered "in estrus" when there was at least one >13 mm pre-ovulatory follicle, and "not in estrus" when growing follicles or corpora lutea were detected (Basioni 2007). All data were analyzed using a General Linear Model procedure (SAS 2007) where the independent variable was the physiological status (estrus/not in estrus) and the behavioral data were dependant variables. The main significant effect of estrus reproductive status (Table 1) was the increased curiosity in the male, particularly, increased duration (P = 0.009) and frequency (P = 0.0004) in male interaction, and spending more time close to the male (P < 0.0001). From this data, it seems that the interest in the male may be a good behavioral indicator of mature phase in the she-camel: the dam looks for and interacts with the male, sniffs around more, spends more time in standing quite near the male and increases tendency to lie down in front of him. Increased curiosity, searching out, looking at, and standing close to the male are reported as estrus behavioral indicators in sheep (Banks 1964). Detection of mature ovarian phase by behavioral indicators to improve timing to perform mating or artificial insemination may have profound implication for enhanced fertility in the dromedary camel (Manjunatha et al 2012), thus our data is a first step in this new and emergent research area. Table 1. Effect of reproductive status (estrus/not estrus) on the duration (sec) and the frequency (n/15 min) of the studied behavioral states and events. Data are expressed as square mean ± SE Duration (sec) Looking at the male Looking outside Standing Walking Searching Male interaction Lying down Estrus 184.2±26.4 247.6±40.7A 204.5±25.8a 48.3±9.6 204.3±41.7 2.7±0.33A 13.0±6.9 Not Estrus 143.1±24.1 380.8±37.1B 118.7±22.9b 61.0±8.7 181.5±38.0 1.5±0.3B 2.4±0.5 Frequency (n/15min) Sniffing Interaction with male Urination Defecation Sound Emission Tail Score Male Time Score Estrus 3.6±0.53 12.4±1.5A 0.2±01 0.2±0.0 21.4±3.6 1.4±0.1 3.6±0.1A Not Estrus 2.4±0.4 4.6±1.3B 0.3±0.1 0.1±0.0 25.9±3.3 1.5±0.1 2.4±0.1B Means followed by different letters differ statistically: A,B; P < 0.01 and a,b; P < 0.05 Bank, E.M. (1964). Behaviour 23, 249. Basioni, G.F. (2007). J. Biol. Sci. 7, 1038. Ismail, S.T., Al-Eknah, M-M., Hemeida N.A. (2007). J King Saud Uni 8, 51. Roelofs, J., López-Gatiusc, F., Hunterd, R.H.F., van Eerdenburge, F.J.C.M. et al. (2010). Theriogenology 74, 327. Manjunatha, B.M., Pratap, N., Al-Bulushi, S., Hago, B.E. (2012) Theriogenology 78, 965. Skidmore, J.A. (2011). Anim. Reprod. Sci. 124,148. This work was funded by European Union, PROCAMED Project

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,004

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,243
Écart entre enseignants0,222 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueArchivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna)Même sujetReproductive Physiology in LivestockTravaux en français237 207