MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7017793283

Book Review: Mediating Moms: Mothers in Popular Culture

2013· article· en· W7017793283 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueTopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University) · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésScholarshipPopular cultureRepresentation (politics)FeminismInstitutionPoliticsPopular media
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Mediating Moms: Mothers in Popular Culture, tackles this enormous topic with gusto through an exploration of the representation of motherhood in popular culture in North America and the United Kingdom.Podnieks broadly defines popular culture to include a range of media courting a mass audience.In her introduction, she marshals an overload of evidence in support of her claim that since 2007, popular culture has exploded with moms.This explosion is fueled by the "Mommy Wars," the media-fueled debate that pits working mothers against stay-at-home moms, and the "New Momism," which refers to the intensified and romanticized expectations for mothers in the twenty-first century.Podneiks clearly situates her collection in the long history of maternal scholarship, invoking Andrea O'Reilly, founder of the Motherhood Initiative for Research and Community Involvement in 2010 and harbinger of all things motherhood studies today.As Podnieks notes, motherhood is not a topic that hasn't been tackled before.The essays collected here collectively acknowledge the feminist scholarship on motherhood, both as a social, cultural, and political institution and as an individual woman's experience.As this latest foray into maternal scholarship demonstrates, each generation of feminist daughters must address the popular representation of motherhood as well as the previous generation's concept and practice of mothering.In the mid-twentieth century, academic and popular writers alike took up the representation of motherhood, most notably in Adrienne Rich's Of Woman Born (1976) and in Nancy Chodorow's Reproduction of Mothering (1978).Podnieks situates her collection specifically within the maternal scholarship that examines the popular representation of motherhood and mothering, acknowledging the important work of scholars such as E. Ann Kaplan (Motherhood and Representation, 1992), Shari L. Thurer (The Myths of Motherhood, 1994), and Sharon Hays (The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood, 1996).Mediating Moms is divided thematically into four sections: "Maternal Surveillance," "Generational Motherhood," "Pregnant and Postpartum Bodies," and "Medical Interventions and Reproductive Technologies."Each section contains between four to six essays, making this collection a significant contribution to maternal scholarship and discourse.The first section, Maternal Surveillance, addresses the myriad of ways that twenty-first century mothers are subjected to constant oversight as a way of circumscribing or delimiting the mother's power and influence.The six essays that comprise this section address the social and cultural function of maternal surveillance in animated situation comedies, reality television, celebrity culture, and sensationalized news stories.The four essays that make up section two, "Generational Motherhood," map the connections and disconnections of mothering across generations.From women's popular fiction to the postfeminist and Third Wave "grassroots" efforts of 'zines, these essays not only demonstrate the ways in which motherhood is defined and transmitted across generations, but also challenge the socially specific ideology regarding age-appropriate motherhood.For example, Imelda Whelehan writes about woman's fiction since 1968, and Irene Gammel looks at L. M. Montgomery's 1908 novel Anne of Green Gables.This section also addresses the representation of motherhood in the current century and the particulars of that experience.Beth O'Connor argues that Yo' Mama Magazine, a 'zine addressed to teen mothers, provides these mothers a space to share and critique dominant representations of motherhood.Although all the essays in this collection wrestle with the presence of the mother within popular culture, the third section, "Pregnant and Postpartum Bodies," centers on the taboos and fantasies of the pregnant body and the new mother.These essays argue that motherhood is both a pre and postpartum experience and that the pregnant body is one that is discursively constructed as full of risk.The topics range from an analysis of the public discourse surrounding breast feeding to the spectacle of starving and suffering African mothers in first-world media.The fourth and final section, "Medical Interventions and Reproductive Technologies," includes five essays.As Podnieks explains in her introduction, "the most contentious maternal issues today deal with fertility and reproduction" (23).Sally Mennill begins the section by exploring the rhetoric of passivity in maternity literature.Other chapters address the confluence of celebrity culture and ideologies regarding postpartum depression and representations of motherhood in the television series Grey's Anatomy.Although the essays collected here primarily focus on representations of motherhood in the Unites States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, Mediating Moms fails in a significant way to consider the relationship between popular motherhood discourse and women of color.Only two essays explicitly address motherhood and mothering for women of color, H. Louise Davis's "Watch Them Suffer, Watch Them Die" and Hosu Kim's "S/Kin of Virtual Mothers: Loss and Mourning on a Korean

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,020
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,068

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0060,004
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0200,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,205
Écart entre enseignants0,199 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueTopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)Même sujetAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics ResearchTravaux en français237 207