Cultivating Territories and Historicity: The Digital Art of Skawennati
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Skawennati Tricia Fragnito is a digital artist whose work emerged in the 1990s and continues to involve themes of colonialism through Internet communities and narrative.This study examines the artist's Internet artworks, first looking at CyberPowWow (1996-2004) and Aboriginal Territories in Cyberspace (2008-) as virtual gathering places to discuss possibilities of using the Internet as an alternative place for First Nations and Native Americans to show artwork.In her Webworks, such as the TimeTraveller™ (2007-) series and Imagining Indians in the 25 th Century (2000-2001), Skawennati reworks historical notions of the past to expose colonialism from the perspective of a Native character.The most recent body of work, 80 Minutes, 80 Movies, 80s Music, is a series of freely-distributed music video project hosted on the video sharing Website Vimeo that was founded in 2004, that explores the historic colonization of network television and music in the 1980s by undermining notions of nostalgia and broadens perspective onto current electronic colonialism.Skawennati's work keenly exemplifies digital art's participating and expansive possibilities for understanding territory, distribution and sharing of "space."Acknowledgments Writing this study would have been shallow without Skawennati's generous assistance and communication with me.Having the opportunity to work with her in her Montreal Studio and correspond with her provided me with necessary first-hand information concerning her personal goals and desires, as well as the technical processes she used to create her digital art.I am extremely grateful and delighted that I had the chance to work with her on this study.Her contributions, especially of showing me what she has reworked that exists now in TimeTraveller™ and outmoded versions of work such as CyberPowWow that is no longer available on the Internet.Experiencing the CyberPowWow chat space was invaluable, because without her providing me with access to this once-interactive chat site, I would not have been able to fully comprehend the dialogue and viewing procedures.The possibility of visiting her studio was realized through funds provided through the Graduate Student Governance Association Research Fellowship, without which I would not have had the finances to support my visit to Montreal.This fellowship gave me the opportunity to supplement my research and to strengthen my understanding of the artist's media and how her use of technology has led to multiple versions of works.It also facilitated our in-depth conversations about her work that continues electronically.My committee members supported me through this process, contributing their expertise on contemporary art and conceptual guidance to strengthen my writing.My thesis chair, Kimberly Paice, has been an especially valuable member to my committee because of her patience and intellectual insights.Her availability and willingness to discuss my writing and revisions helped to make this procedure a positive and fruitful experience.Because of her, this thesis is a sliver of the education I experienced during this process; she allowed me to explore multiple ideas while forming this piece of writing.She encouraged and guided my creativity in my research and writing.Jordan Tate was diligent in contributing to my education of the Internet and Internet art, and challenged me to draw deeper connections to other artists that strengthened my understanding of the medium.Morgan Thomas was also a valuable asset in encouraging my analysis of post-colonialism and work by Native people.Finally, I would like to thank my family members and friends who have supported me through this process by providing much-needed moral support.Without their love and assurance these last few months would have been entirely overwhelming and seemingly impossible.I am especially grateful to my mother, Ellen Guerrettaz, who, despite fighting cancer during the last few months of my thesis writing, continued to give objective guidance, direction, and encouragement.Thanks, Mom. Table of ContentsIntroduction………………………………………………………………………………………..
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,013 | 0,019 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».