MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7018009335

Cultivating Territories and Historicity: The Digital Art of Skawennati

2014· article· en· W7018009335 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueArt, Technology, and Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCyberspaceThe InternetStudioColonialismExpansiveIndie filmPerspective (graphical)Work (physics)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Skawennati Tricia Fragnito is a digital artist whose work emerged in the 1990s and continues to involve themes of colonialism through Internet communities and narrative.This study examines the artist's Internet artworks, first looking at CyberPowWow (1996-2004) and Aboriginal Territories in Cyberspace (2008-) as virtual gathering places to discuss possibilities of using the Internet as an alternative place for First Nations and Native Americans to show artwork.In her Webworks, such as the TimeTraveller™ (2007-) series and Imagining Indians in the 25 th Century (2000-2001), Skawennati reworks historical notions of the past to expose colonialism from the perspective of a Native character.The most recent body of work, 80 Minutes, 80 Movies, 80s Music, is a series of freely-distributed music video project hosted on the video sharing Website Vimeo that was founded in 2004, that explores the historic colonization of network television and music in the 1980s by undermining notions of nostalgia and broadens perspective onto current electronic colonialism.Skawennati's work keenly exemplifies digital art's participating and expansive possibilities for understanding territory, distribution and sharing of "space."Acknowledgments Writing this study would have been shallow without Skawennati's generous assistance and communication with me.Having the opportunity to work with her in her Montreal Studio and correspond with her provided me with necessary first-hand information concerning her personal goals and desires, as well as the technical processes she used to create her digital art.I am extremely grateful and delighted that I had the chance to work with her on this study.Her contributions, especially of showing me what she has reworked that exists now in TimeTraveller™ and outmoded versions of work such as CyberPowWow that is no longer available on the Internet.Experiencing the CyberPowWow chat space was invaluable, because without her providing me with access to this once-interactive chat site, I would not have been able to fully comprehend the dialogue and viewing procedures.The possibility of visiting her studio was realized through funds provided through the Graduate Student Governance Association Research Fellowship, without which I would not have had the finances to support my visit to Montreal.This fellowship gave me the opportunity to supplement my research and to strengthen my understanding of the artist's media and how her use of technology has led to multiple versions of works.It also facilitated our in-depth conversations about her work that continues electronically.My committee members supported me through this process, contributing their expertise on contemporary art and conceptual guidance to strengthen my writing.My thesis chair, Kimberly Paice, has been an especially valuable member to my committee because of her patience and intellectual insights.Her availability and willingness to discuss my writing and revisions helped to make this procedure a positive and fruitful experience.Because of her, this thesis is a sliver of the education I experienced during this process; she allowed me to explore multiple ideas while forming this piece of writing.She encouraged and guided my creativity in my research and writing.Jordan Tate was diligent in contributing to my education of the Internet and Internet art, and challenged me to draw deeper connections to other artists that strengthened my understanding of the medium.Morgan Thomas was also a valuable asset in encouraging my analysis of post-colonialism and work by Native people.Finally, I would like to thank my family members and friends who have supported me through this process by providing much-needed moral support.Without their love and assurance these last few months would have been entirely overwhelming and seemingly impossible.I am especially grateful to my mother, Ellen Guerrettaz, who, despite fighting cancer during the last few months of my thesis writing, continued to give objective guidance, direction, and encouragement.Thanks, Mom. Table of ContentsIntroduction………………………………………………………………………………………..

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,030

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0130,019
Communication savante0,0060,004
Science ouverte0,0010,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,176
Écart entre enseignants0,167 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)Même sujetArt, Technology, and CultureTravaux en français237 207