Deep in the shadows of loss: An exploration of grief, mourning, and intellectual disability
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This qualitative research project explores grief and mourning experiences of people labelled/with intellectual disabilities subsequent to the death of someone important in their lives. The primary research question was: in what ways do people labelled/with intellectual disabilities experience grief after the death of a significant person in their lives? The need for a project of this kind is grounded in the lack of research and social work practice literature related to better understanding grief, mourning, and support experiences after a death from the perspective of people labelled/with intellectual disabilities. The dual purpose of this research is to better understand (and help others understand) the complex experience of grief after a death for bereaved people labelled/with intellectual disabilities, and, from this understanding, develop ideas for how social workers (and other professionals and support people) can provide sensitive, timely, and meaningful grief support over the lengthy time where they may have a range of grief reactions. To achieve this dual purpose, the research methodology of interpretive description was used within a care ethics framework of engaging with ‘vulnerable’ populations. Individual interviews were conducted with people labelled/with intellectual disabilities (N=14) from different locations in Ontario. In addition, support people (N=4), and key informants (N=5) were also interviewed. The interviews were followed by thematic analysis of the data collected. Participants provided insights relevant to the research question and pre-existing literature on the topic that have implications for understanding the intersection of grief and disability, and for practice. The findings demonstrate that although many of the grief reactions experienced by the bereaved participants are similar to those of the neurotypical population there remain significant differences in a number of areas, such as limited choice, exclusion, significant loss histories and trauma, and gatekeepers monitoring grief expression, that have implications for practice and education. Notably, bereaved people labelled/with intellectual disabilities indicated that rather than always being only the recipients of bereavement support, they want to use their experiences to help others - their bereaved peers, family members, and paid staff. This project contributes valuable practice insights and points to the need for better education for social workers (and other professionals in developmental services) in the intersecting topics of thanatology and disability studies.\nAccessible Abstract:\n· 14 people labelled/with intellectual disabilities shared what it was like for them after someone important to them died.\n· They shared that they had many different feelings, thoughts, reactions in their bodies, and questions after the person died.\n· The people labelled/with intellectual disabilities said that it is important to have the choice of whether or not to go to a funeral or the cemetery. They do not want people to keep secrets from them. They want to hear the bad news and be supported when this news is shared.\n· Many shared that they had a lot of losses in their lives (living away from home, many staff that come and go, and people who died) and some had lots of trauma experiences too.\n· Bereaved people labelled/with intellectual disabilities told me that they want to help other bereaved people (family, friends, paid staff) because they have learned so much from their own experiences.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».