Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This screenplay is an adaptation based on the mythological inventor, Daedalus. Most audiences are less familiar with who Daedalus is compared to what he accomplished (designed and built the Labyrinth) or who he is associated with (his son, Icarus). For the most part, as found in Apollodorus’ The Library, Daedalus’ story weaves throughout the background of better-known heroes and villains. That is not to say his story is any less interesting, or – as many myths end – tragic. In my script, I attempt to flesh out the brief origins of the great inventor. This tale is found in The Library and claims that Daedalus once lived in Athens, taking his nephew Talus as his apprentice. When Daedalus realizes that Talus could potentially rival his own craftsmanship, the inventor tosses the boy off of a building in a fit of blind rage. It is a tragic tale in itself, but with the script, it is my goal to reshape the narrative so that it might appeal to a contemporary audience while staying true to the general themes of tragedy and playing them up in a grander scale. As I do so, I include some better-known characters in mythological history who chronologically (in the loosest sense of the word) could have interacted with Daedalus in Athens. My screenplay toys with the tragedy genre as Daedalus, his sister Perdix, and his nephew Talus are slowly sucked into the influence of a famed sorceress. The choice to include Medea (and later on, Jason) is based on Euripides’ renowned play, Medea, in which Aegeus (king of Athens) offers the magic user refuge in his city. Later, in the Theseus myth, we learn that Medea has married Aegeus (after killing her children to get back at Jason and fleeing from Corinth). Not only does Medea’s tragedy intersect with Daedalus’, but it also provides me the opportunity to have these strong characters interact while still hitting all the plot points found in the original myth. My goal while writing this screenplay was never to repeat the same story. Instead, it was to revise the rhythm of the tragedy while still maintaining the important beats that had rung so true to me in the beginning. In this attempt, I have shifted the definition of tragedy to match that of today’s general public, just as Shakespeare did in his day-and-age. In my critical essay, following the script, I explore this idea of changing ideas behind the definition of tragedy. I also explore how the experiences of cinematic spectacle affect the tragic genre as opposed to the theatrical.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,033 | 0,044 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».