MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7018559919

The Effects of a GnRH Antagonist, Cetrorelix, on Ovarian Function in Cattle

2024· dissertation· en· W7018559919 sur OpenAlexfundno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2024
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Mots-clésFollicular phaseOvulationFollicleEstrous cycleArtificial inseminationLuteal phaseInseminationTestosterone (patch)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Estradiol-based ovulation synchronization protocol are effective for breeding management in cattle, however, political pressure from the European Union has resulted in many countries enacting similar bans on the use of estradiol in livestock animals. Our long-term goal is to engineer an alternative protocol for fixed-time artificial insemination that is simple, steroid-free, and effective during different stages of the estrus cycle. Two studies were conducted to determine the effects of a GnRH antagonist, cetrorelix, on the follicular dynamics in cattle during different stages of follicular growth and in different endocrine milieus. The specific objective was to test the hypothesis that cetrorelix would induce regression of the dominant follicle and induce a new follicular wave emergence at a predictable time after treatment. In the first study (Chapter 4, two experiments), we explored the effects of cetrorelix at three stages of dominant follicle development and synchrony of subsequent follicular wave emergence and ovulation in cattle. In this study, ovaries of sexually mature heifers (>13 months of age, n=8 per group) were examined daily by transrectal ultrasonography to detect ovulation (Day 0 = wave emergence) and record the number, location, and diameter of follicles. In Experiment 1 of Study 1, heifers were given two doses of cetrorelix (1.5mg x2; 0.5 mg/ml in 5% D-Mannitol) 24 hr apart im starting on Day 1 (Cetro1-2; early-growing/pre-selection phase dominant follicle), Day 3 (Cetro3-4; mid-growing phase dominant follicle), and Day 6 (Cetro6-7; static phase dominant follicle), or normal saline (Control). Jugular venipuncture plasma samples were collected 0, 2, 4, and 6 days after cetrorelix treatment to assess luteal function. In all cetrorelix-treated heifers, dominant follicle regression occurred, and a new follicular wave emerged consistently 5.8 ± 0.3 days after treatment. There was a tendency for cetrorelix to reduce the diameter of the corpus luteum (CL), but there was no difference in the luteal function or lifespan between Control and treatment groups. In Experiment 2 of Study 1, heifers were given a single bolus of 3 mg cetrorelix im on Day 1, 3, or 6 of the wave; prostaglandin 9 days after cetrorelix treatment; and then heifers were artificially inseminated 12 hr after estrus detection. A single bolus of cetrorelix induced similar follicular regression as in Experiment 1 and a new follicular wave emerged consistently 3.6 ± 0.3 days after treatment. Artificial inseminations resulted in a 56.5% pregnancy rate (n=13/23) in all cetrorelix-treated heifers versus 42.9% (n=3/7) in Control, indicating no adverse effects of cetrorelix on oocyte competence. In the second study (Chapter 5), we examined the effects of cetrorelix on the ability to induce a new follicular wave by inhibiting ovulation during the preovulatory phase (Experiment 1) and determined the effect of cetrorelix on the ovulatory ability of the dominant follicle to exogenous challenge of hCG (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1 of Study 2, heifers (n=6 per group) were given either a luteolytic dose of cloprostenol on Day 4 and 4.5 (PreOv group) or heifers were allowed to maintain a functional CL (Luteal group). All heifers were given 3 mg cetrorelix im on Day 5 and the ovaries were examined daily until the next ovulation or wave emergence. Cetrorelix prevented the dominant follicle from ovulating and induced follicular regression in the Luteal and PreOv groups, resulting in a consistent follicular wave emergence 3.1 ± 0.3 days after cetrorelix treatment. In Experiment 2 of Study 2, heifers were synchronized by ultrasound-guided follicular ablation in combination with an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device for 5 days and PGF at the time of removal. Heifers were given either cetrorelix (Cetro groups) or normal saline (Control groups) on Day 5 (2x2 factorial; n=6 heifers per group) and all groups were treated with 1500 IU of hCG im on Day 7. Jugular venipuncture plasma samples were collected from all animals for progesterone analysis (-24 hr, 24 hr, and 48 hr from cetrorelix treatment). Cetrorelix did not prevent the dominant follicle from ovulating in response to exogenous hCG 48 hr after treatment. Combined between the two experiments, cetrorelix does not affect the diameter, vascularity, and progesterone secretion of the CL. In summary, a single bolus or split doses of cetrorelix given during the pre-selection, growing, or static phase of dominant follicle development and during the preovulatory phase induced follicular regression, resulting in the emergence of a new follicular wave at a predictable interval post-treatment. CL function and subsequent oocyte competence were not affected. Finally, cetrorelix treatment is an effective method to synchronize wave emergence and ovulation for reproductive management in cattle.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,005

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,164
Écart entre enseignants0,159 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Même sujetReproductive Physiology in LivestockTravaux en français237 207