Discussion following the Remarks of Mr. Phillips and Ms. Erickson
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Yeah, I had a question on intellectual property.Isn't it true that U.S. intellectual property protection is broader than Canada's?In other words, aren't there differences in the scope of intellectual property protection in this area, which involves living things frequently?I think that makes a difference, doesn't it?MR.PHILILPS: Yeah.I mean, the intellectual property system is fairly complex.I mean, it is not just patents and plant breeders' rights, but we have somewhat different sets of structures in both countries, and then different again from the international system or other countries.In Canada, we have very similar definitions of what's patentable, except that we haven't gone as far along as allowing patents on multi cellulared organisms.We've gone up to and including patenting of singular cellulared organisms.With the Harvard Mouse case that went through the Supreme Court last year, the judgment was that the Patent Act was never intended to deal with multi cellular organisms.Now, we've got a reference on the Schmeiser case, which relates toreally doesn't relate to patenting at all, or the patenting of higher life forms, but it's been construed in the Supreme Court appeal as relating to patenting of higher life forms.And in that case, they want to bring the bar back from ameiosis closer to the single cellulared organisms, because there's gray area there.We know ameiosis isn't allowed under the decision, but a single celled organism is.So where's the line?Is it single celled or is it multi celled, not sentient?You know, that is the debate that is going on.The effect of that could be very large or very small.Practically speaking, it is not that big a deal for the products that are in the markets today in the agri-food world, because there are other protection mechanisms.You can use contracts; you can use a whole variety of ways of stopping people from reproducing your technology.But in the long run, if you can't get patents that are clear and succinct, the industry says that they will be less interested in investing money in research that only has application in Canada.So we may get me, too, research, but we won't get research into products that are critically important to Canada more than the United States.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».