MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7018632352

Ecophysiological responses of four boreal tree species to soil nitrogen supply

2017· dissertation· en· W7018632352 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University) · 2017
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Établissements canadiensLakehead University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTranspirationTaigaBlack sprucePhotosynthesisSeedlingBiomass (ecology)Stomatal conductanceBoreal
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The ecophysiological responses of four boreal tree species, trembling aspen
\n(Populus tremuloides Michx.), black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.), white spruce
\n(Picea glauca (Moench) Voss), and jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) were examined at
\nsix different levels (from 25 to 775 ppm) of soil nitrogen (N). At the 50th and 100th day of
\ntreatment, two-year-old conifer seedlings and six-month-old trembling aspen seedlings were
\nmeasured for gas exchange, foliar N concentration, growth and biomass allocation traits.
\nThe gas exchange and resource use efficiency responses varied with species. The
\nadditional N input had no significant effect on photosynthesis (see document) and positive
\neffect on transpiration (E, mmol/m2/s), and beyond 175 ppm N treatment it produced
\nnegative effect on whole seedling photosynthetic capacity (see document) in trembling
\naspen. A, E and At in conifers responded negatively to N treatment, except for a brief
\npositive response from 25 to 125 ppm N in jack pine. <l>PSII
\n revealed relevant relationship
\nwith A but only for jack pine and white spruce. We found explicit positive response of
\nfoliar N concentration and negative response of PNUE to increasing soil N availability.
\nHowever, the trends of PWUE between species varied across six N treatments and possibly
\ndue to luxury consumption. The PWUE was positively correlated with soil N supply in only
\nwhite spruce and was negatively correlated in other species. The sufficient soil N
\navailability for optimum gas exchange and nutritional status were at 75 ppm N for black
\nspruce and at 125 for the other three species.
\nOverall, the growth response of aspen to N was more pronounced than that of
\nconifers due to its fast growing nature. Significant growth response of aspen occurred
\nbetween the 75 to 175 ppm N treatments. Substantial growth reduction occurred when
\naspen seedlings were induced to excessively high soil N concentrations (375 and 775 ppm),
\nspecifically due to the vulnerability of these seedlings to pest damages. This is also related
\nto the significant increase in foliar N concentration at these N treatments. Greatest growth
\nwas achieved at 25 ppm N addition rate in black spruce and jack pine, and most notables at
\n125 ppm N in white spruce. However, these N levels are not conclusive when optimum soil
\nN concentration(s) for gas exchange parameters, particularly for At, in these seedlings are
\ntaken into consideration. Nonetheless, at highest soil N supply (375 and 775 ppm), the
\ngrowth of conifer seedlings was not as adversely affected as that of aspen seedlings. Our
\nresults also proved strong significance of N availability on biomass allocation between root
\nand shoot components and height growth in all species. Root production was significantly suppressed as soil N availability increased in the conifers. The opposite was found in aspen.
\nIn conifers, the proportions of total seedling biomass allocated to roots (or the root-toshoot
\nratio, R/S), at all N treatments, were highest in white spruce, followed by black
\nspruce then jack pine. The R/S ratio in aspen was comparable with, but followed an
\nopposite pattern to, white spruce. The stem and foliage productions in all studied species
\nshowed negligible positive response to increasing soil N treatments. However, with the
\nexception of aspen, the order of the species allocating highest to lowest portions of its total
\nbiomass to the foliage followed the exact opposite pattern as that of root allocation
\npercentage. Aspen showed lesser biomass allocation to the foliage than conifers. However,
\nit allocated highest percentages of total seedling biomass to the stem, at all N treatments,
\nfollowed in sequential order by black spruce, white spruce and jack pine.
\nWhen all ecophysiological parameters are considered, our results indicated that low
\nsoil N availability, such as that at 25 ppm, does not adversely affect the boreal seedling
\ngrowth and survival as much as it does at excessively high soil N availability (e.g., 375 and
\n775 ppm). Within the sufficient N regimes (i.e., 75 - 175 ppm), the most suitable soil N
\nconcentration for black spruce is at 75 ppm and at 125 ppm for other species.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,675
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,918

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,243
Écart entre enseignants0,205 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University)Même sujetSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsTravaux en français237 207