Does the way we pay primary care providers influence emergency department use during after-hours?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the early 2000s, Ontario introduced extensive primary care reforms to increase around-the-clock access to comprehensive primary care in response to inadequate access to primary care, including the way Ontario primary care physicians were paid. This thesis investigates the extent to which changes in physician payment could affect emergency department visits. First, a review evaluating the impact of access to primary care on primary care and emergency department utilization was conducted. Secondly, the impact of Ontario’s after-hours premium on emergency department visits was investigated, first within Ontario, then compared to four control provinces. Finally, rates of primary care services and emergency department visits were compared between the two most popular physician remuneration models. Data sources include databases housed at ICES as well as the Canadian Community Health Survey linked to the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System. The review found that while improving access to primary care increased primary care visits, the effects on emergency department visits were often limited, and the effects depends on the intervention used to improve access to care and the context of the health care system. The introduction of Ontario’s after-hours premium was associated with a reduction in less-urgent emergency department visits, particularly during after-hours; however, subsequent increases in the premium were found to have only a small further reduction in emergency department visits and comparisons to other provinces suggested that an increase in the premium was unlikely to be causal. Physicians paid by blended capitation were found to provide fewer primary care services than physicians paid by enhanced/blended fee-for-service model, especially outside regular working-hours. For most patients, having a physician paid by blended capitation was associated with making more emergency department visits; however, for patients with multiple chronic conditions, blended capitation was associated with a reduction in more urgent emergency department visits. The way primary care physicians are remunerated can influence the way patients receive care, in both the primary care and emergency department setting, as patients in the blended capitation model may receive fewer primary care services but make more less-urgent emergency department visits.\nTRANSLATE with x English Arabic Hebrew Polish Bulgarian Hindi Portuguese Catalan Hmong Daw Romanian Chinese Simplified Hungarian Russian Chinese Traditional Indonesian Slovak Czech Italian Slovenian Danish Japanese Spanish Dutch Klingon Swedish English Korean Thai Estonian Latvian Turkish Finnish Lithuanian Ukrainian French Malay Urdu German Maltese Vietnamese Greek Norwegian Welsh Haitian Creole Persian TRANSLATE with COPY THE URL BELOW Back EMBED THE SNIPPET BELOW IN YOUR SITE Enable collaborative features and customize widget: Bing Webmaster Portal Back
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,022 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».