Humus Form ERB 2010. A European Reference Base for humus forms: proposal for a morpho-functional classification.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
STRUCTURE OF THE CLASSIFICATION \nThe classification has been conceived for forest soils, for which more information and larger datasets are available, as well as for soils of grasslands, pastures and wetland areas, with a negligible to strong human impact. It is not suited to tilled agroecosystems, because tillage destroys the “natural” organization and radically alters the functioning of the surface horizons. The manuals of the FAO (2006), IUSS Working Group \nWRB (2007) or Soil Survey Staff (2010) are more appropriate for describing and classifying these soils. An \nongoing Canadian-German project on topsoil characterization of arable soils will be presented at the IUSS conference 2010. \nThe humus form classification is based on the sequence and morphological characteristics, including \nmorphological evidence of biological activity, of organic and/or organo-mineral horizons observed and \ndescribed in the field. In some cases a few basic chemical data (pH, organic carbon content) are required. A complete set of diagnostic organic and organo-mineral horizons, which are mutually exclusive, is defined. \nThe classification keys use diagnostic horizons and other complementary topsoil or environmental data. \nEvery mineral horizon cited in this paper has been classed and named using the manual of the IUSS Working Group (2007). \nThe first dichotomy of the classification separates never saturated and saturated (submerged) humus \nforms: \n- TERRESTRIAL humus forms: these are never submerged and/or water-saturated, or only for a few days per year. A or AE (non hydromorphic) organo-mineral horizons characterize these forms. \nIn a second and more detailed step of the classification, Terroforms (= typical) are separated from Entiforms (= directly on bedrock or parent material) and Paraforms (= atypical); - SEMITERRESTRIAL humus forms: these are submerged and/or water-saturated. Hydroforms are submerged and/or water-saturated for relatively short periods (less than 6 months per year) and are characterized by Ag or AEg hydromorphic organo-mineral horizons; Histoforms and \nEpihistoforms are submerged and/or water-saturated for protracted periods (usually more than 6 months per year) and are characterized by organo-mineral Aa or organic H horizons. \nWithin each group of the Terrestrial compartment (Terroforms, Entiforms and Paraforms) and within \nthe group of Hydroforms of the Semiterrestrial compartment, the same five “biological types” are identified on a morpho-functional basis: Mull, Amphi, Moder, Tangel and Mor. Within Histoforms and Epihistoforms, the Tangel biological type is not present, but a characteristic “soil moisture regime” generates \nthe Anmoor biological type. These “biological types” can be considered as the first taxonomic level of the \nclassification. For Terroforms and Histoforms, the most important and best-known groups of humus forms, a second level of classification has been created. Here, each unit of the first level (Mull, Moder, …) is split in two or more biological sub-types (i.e. Eumull, Mesomull; Hemimoder, Dysmoder…). \nSpecific vocabulary listed in the section “specific terms”, and topsoil layers detailed under the heading \n“diagnostic horizons”, furnish the potential user with the necessary information for his/her field investigation of all Terrestrial and Semiterrestrial humus forms.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».