Investigation of pain and discomfort associated with anti-VEGF injections
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) is the only current treatment for neovascular age-related macular Degeneration (AMD) but necessitates ongoing patient adherence with recuring injections to be effective. Furthermore, AMD itself poses a significant social and economic burden, as the population ages. Patient experience is one of the central pillars of the patient journey. Ocular pain is arguably one of the most common outcomes that affects the patient experience during intravitreal injections, with post-injection experiences and patient adherence to treatment remaining relatively underexplored. Thus, improving the understanding of factors associated with pain and using this to inform pain management strategies in ophthalmic care can drive quality improvement to enhance the patient experience. \n\t \nThe aim of the work presented in this thesis was to describe the experiences of patients undergoing anti-VEGF injections associated with pain and the impact on patient adherence and wellbeing, and to explore the factors that contribute to pain. \n\t \nAn exploratory sequential mixed methods study was undertaken involving semi-structured face-to-face interviews (n=14 individuals with neovascular AMD, n=7 healthcare practitioners), followed by a quantitative phase utilising questionnaires and measurement of electrodermal activity (n=65 individuals with neovascular AMD). The findings from initially exploring the patient experiences associated with the intravitreal treatment using thematic analysis, were apprehension, a dull-aching and sharp pain during injection, and prolonged soreness and irritation of up to 36 hours post-injection affecting their sleep and recovery. Building on the qualitative outcomes, questionnaires were then used to assess pain (Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, SF-MPQ; Visual Analogue Scale, VAS), anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) and wellbeing (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale) at baseline, and at 1-2 hours and 24 hours post-treatment. A physiological measure, EDA (electrodermal activity) was used as one of the primary outcomes to objectively examine patients’ level of arousal during the intravitreal injection procedure. \n \nThis study employed multiple linear regression models to explain the predictor variables associated with pain at 1-2 hours and 24 hours post-treatment for VAS and MPQ (main component of SF-MPQ). The optimum multiple regression model identified significant predictor variables, the injection SCR (Skin Conductance Response) amplitude, baseline state anxiety, type of anti-VEGF (aflibercept) and bilateral injections, explained 38% of the variance in VAS scores. The injection SCR amplitude was the most significant predictor of pain at both 1-2 hours and 24 hours post-treatment. Also, questionnaire data reported that at 24 hours post-treatment, 4.7% of participants continued to experience severe sharp, aching or tender pain, and 15.6% reported feeling a moderate tiring-exhausting pain. \n\t \nA qualitative study exploring the impact of COVID-19 on patient experience was undertaken involving semi-structured telephone interviews (n=17 individuals with neovascular AMD). Nearly half of the participants reported perceived vision deterioration, with some losing their ability to drive. Most participants felt anxious of losing their eyesight due to lack of timely care and absence of communication with the practice. Isolation and fear of losing eyesight impacted participants’ wellbeing with some reporting feeling lonely and depressed. Integrating these findings with individual perspectives captured a comprehensive understanding of the emotional and physical qualities of pain. Adherence to treatment was a key priority for patients over pain and COVID-19 health risks. \n\t \nAn understanding of pain during and following intravitreal injections may inform clinical practice on implementing pain assessment tools, providing consistent verbal instructions to patients on avoiding contact with the injected eye and advising them on specific pain relief techniques, including topical ice application to self-manage their pain at home. High injection SCR amplitudes and baseline state anxiety may also inform clinical practice on assessing patients’ anxiety at regulated intervals and advising on nurturing self-talk and relaxation techniques to manage their apprehension. Engaging communications to reassure and strengthen patient confidence in their treatment course are meaningful and valuable qualities to patients receiving intravitreal injections.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».