MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7019942984

Impact of predation by Laricobius nigrinus (Coleoptera: Derodontidae) and Leucotaraxis spp. (Diptera: Chamaemyiidae) on Adelges tsugae (Hemiptera: Adelgidae) and Tsuga canadensis (Pinales: Pinaceae) tree health

2023· dissertation· en· W7019942984 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueVTechWorks (Virginia Tech) · 2023
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueForest Insect Ecology and Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesU.S. Forest ServiceU.S. Department of Agriculture
Mots-clésTsugaPredationBiological pest controlRange (aeronautics)Invasive speciesIntroduced species
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The hemlock woolly adelgid (HWA), Adelges tsugae Annand, (Hemiptera: Adelgidae) is an invasive species in the eastern United States and Canada. This scale-like insect feeds on the xylem ray parenchyma cells of eastern hemlock, Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carrière, (Pinales: Pinaceae) and Carolina hemlock, Tsuga caroliniana Englem., resulting in multiple physical and physiological symptoms, all of which commonly leads to tree mortality within 4 to 10 years. Currently, HWA has spread throughout most of the eastern hemlock range and all of the range of Carolina hemlock and threatens the forest ecosystems they serve. In its introduced range, there are no natural enemies specialized to feed on HWA and suppress HWA populations below damaging levels. In the urban environment and at some public locations, the use of chemicals, such as imidacloprid, have been used to temporarily protect hemlocks, however; this does not provide a permanent solution. In the 1990's a classical biological control program for HWA was created with the goal to suppress HWA populations below damaging levels to reduce tree mortality, and to reduce the negative effects associated with the loss of either hemlock species. Presently, four predators have become the main focus of this program: Laricobius nigrinus Fender, Laricobius osakensis Shiyake and Montgomery (Coleoptera: Derodontidae), Leucotaraxis argenticollis (Zetterstedt), and Leucotaraxis piniperda (Malloch) (Diptera: Chamaemyiidae). Throughout the eastern US, La. nigrinus has established populations and expanded its distribution beyond where it has been released. Although it has successfully established and continues to spread, its effect on eastern hemlock health has been unknown. A 1-year study, carried out in 2021, revealed that La. nigrinus predation on the sistens generation not only reduced the sistens generation, but also had a similar net photosynthetic rate to the negative control on 1-2 year old shoot growth. In addition, significantly more shoots were produced for treatment branches with the highest La. nigrinus density. This also led to a significantly reduced aestivating sistens density compared to the no predator treatment. However, predation was insufficient to reduce HWA populations below the suggested damaging threshold of eastern hemlock (< 4 HWA/cm), suggesting that additional predators would be needed. Recently, the western strain of Le. argenticollis had been released in the eastern US. However, its phenology in the eastern US was unknown. A 2-year study, from 2021-2023, revealed that Le. argenticollis eggs and larvae were present when both generations of HWA adults with eggs and HWA nymphs were present. In addition, Le. argenticollis was capable of completing development in NY and VA, showing promise that this species could establish populations in the eastern US. Timing the adult fly releases into cages at the time when sistens were producing eggs resulted in Le. argenticollis phenology to synchronize well with HWA phenology at both locations, thus providing additional support for its release in the eastern US. Another 2-year study conducted in 2021-2022, at five locations (MD, NC, PA, TN, and VA), sought to determine how the predation of La. nigrinus and Le. piniperda, alone and together, would impact the sistens and progrediens generations, as well as how their predation would affect the aestivating sistens density and new shoot growth production. From this study, La. osakensis was found as the dominant Laricobius species present at the TN site, and similarly to La. nigrinus, reduced intact ovisac density in. This provided a small preview in La. osakensis capabilities and how this predator may be impacting HWA populations at locations where it has established. In order to assess Le. piniperda's impact on the progrediens generation, mesh cages were applied to treatment branches at each site. The study found that Le. piniperda could reproduce at all field sites and that the percentage of disturbed progrediens was significantly higher for treatments with Le. piniperda present at all field sites, except at PA in 2022. However, the affect of both of these predators on the aestivating sistens density and eastern hemlock health was inconclusive. In addition, the percentage of new shoot growth was highly variable among treatments at all field sites, and there was no treatment effect on the mean length of new shoot growth produced at all field sites. The results of this study suggests that in order to fully understand the affects of these predators on HWA populations and on hemlock tree health, longer term studies should be conducted. However, this study does provide some insight on the capabilities of these predators in the short term and supports the continued release and redistribution of these predators.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,764
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,248
Écart entre enseignants0,240 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle