L'aljama de jueus de Fraga
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
While there is no clear evidence of Jews having been present in the town of\nFraga when the Count of Barcelona Ramon Berenguer IV reconquered it in\n1149, the possibility cannot be dismissed out of hand.\nThe first documentary reference to the Jews of Fraga appears in a letter that King\nJames I of Catalonia-Aragon sent to the Jews living in the town in around 1237.\nAnother reference can be found in a document dated 8 October 1264, in which the\nking acknowledged that every aljama in Aragon had paid his eldest son, Peter, the\nannual tax for the Christmas celebrations. It should be noted that Fraga contributed\nto the coffers of Saragossa at the time in question, as did Lleida [Lérida].\nIn 1282, King Peter the Great ordered Fragas Jewish aljama to submit its\naccount books corresponding to the last 15 years for inspection in order to clear\nup a matter related to tax payment. Counting back 15 years from 1282 gives\n1267-1268 as possibly either the time at which Fragas Jewish aljama was first\nestablished or the point at which Fraga became accountable to Lleida rather\nthan to Saragossa.\nIn summary, Fragas Jewish aljama was already established in the 13th century,\nunder the jurisdiction of that of Lleida. There had been Jews in the town\nsince 1237, and a Jewish community since 1267-1268, when the Jews of both\nFraga and Lleida ceased to have ties with Saragossas Jewish community. The\nJewish aljama in Fraga spanned carrer Barranco and La Collada, encompassing\nthe present-day passageways of San Julián, Santa Irene, Aitona and Santa Margarita.\nAccessible via a gate on carrer Barranco, the Jewish quarter had a bakery,\nstores, wells or storage pits, wine cellars, workshops and shops looking out onto\nthe street. However, there are now no traces of any of them, nor of the synagogue.\nThe authorities that represented the Jewish community comprised a\nsecretary, a rabbi or teacher, a treasurer, an almoner, a town crier and a gatekeeper\nor area guard, one of whom would also have acted as a judge. The rabbi\noversaw religious celebrations and feast days. The Jews of Fraga came to enjoy\ngenuine privileges as a result of a series of decrees issued in 1328.\nThe Jews contributed to standard royal expenditure through taxes known as\nthe cena (a hospitality tax paid to the royal court) and the quèstia (an irregular\ntax usually levied in response to specific needs). Queen Maria de Luna exempted\nthem from the cena tax in 1396, but it was reinstated following restoration work on the aljama in 1436. The Jews contributions to the extraordinary\ncharges imposed by the king were unusual in that they could be made in an individual\ncapacity, i. e. directly to the Crown. The Jews made such contributions\nwhen princes and princesses married, when members of the royal family were\nborn, when kings were crowned and when funding was required for military\ncampaigns, as well as through the morabatí tax (paid to the king in exchange for\na royal promise to refrain from altering the coinage), such as that of 1397, etc.\nIn 1408, an attempt was made to reduce the size of the Jews debt corresponding\nto annual fees levied on property, at which point they owed varying amounts to Fragas\nAugustinian monastery (outstanding since 1397), to Queen Violante de Bar and\nto the priest of the Corpus Christi Chapel of the Church of Saint John of Lleida.\nThe Jewish quarter was abandoned until 1436, after which time it apparently\nmade a successful recovery. Information on the period in question is very\nscarce, however.\nThe Jews were granted many specific privileges, notably including measures\nto help them increase their earnings through sales of products such as wine\n(1309, 1322, 1324), taxes, called cises, on food products (1389, 1399, 1409)\nand a 10-year exemption from the cena tax (1400); exemption from fees, called\nlluïsme and fadiga, payable to landowners as a result of transfer of landed property\n(1384, 1389); waived debts (1389); exemption from fines and penalties\n(1399); the right not to be disturbed (1399); the privilege of not being the subject\nof accusations (1409); the right to represent themselves in court (1391);\nexemption from contributions payable upon slaughtering animals (1409); protection\nfor aljama officials involved in crimes (1453); the right to establish an\naljama with up to 100 households (1413); the right to receive pledges from\nChristians (1413); free transport of belongings (1413); the right to have a house\nin any part of the town (1436); exemption from the morabatí tax (1398, 1451);\nand the privilege of not being prosecuted by Christian courts.\nThere are no records of any deaths having occurred in Fraga in the disturbances\nthat took place in August 1391. As of that time, the town council included\ntwo representatives of the aljama. The conversion of Jews in 1414-1415\nled to more problems, possibly similar in all the aljamas along the banks of the\nCinca River. The problems in question basically consisted of the conversions \ngiving rise to a cultural change, a break with tradition and the abandonment of\nthe aljama, whose inhabitants moved to another part of the town. The neophytes\ndid not see why charges applicable to the Jews should also apply to them,\nand were forced to contribute thereto against their will. Some neophytes encountered\nproblems in terms of obtaining annual payments levied on property\ndue to them as Jews or the heirs of Jews. After 1436, the Jewish quarter was restored and its synagogue reopened, and as many as 50 families lived there until\nthe expulsion of the Jews in 1492.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».