MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7020304689

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of breastfeeding women in Krong, Kep municipality, Cambodia / by Hilary M. Wren.

2017· dissertation· en· W7020304689 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University) · 2017
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBreastfeedingBreastfeeding promotionChosePromotion (chess)Public healthHealth promotionAffect (linguistics)Breast feeding
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

South-Eastern Asia has the highest levels of undernourishment among children in Asia. Cambodia remains one of the least developed and poorest countries in this region; the probability of a child dying before age five is roughly 1 in 10. Given this information, there is an international expectation that Khmer mothers of newborns initiate and maintain exclusive breastfeeding for the recommended six months. There is also a
\nconcomitant expectation that Cambodian society will provide these mothers with essential health services, education, and support systems in order to ensure that breastfeeding is a success. The purpose of this study was to;
\n1. Determine mothers? knowledge related to infant feeding.
\n2. Determine attitudes that affect mothers? decisions to initiate breastfeeding and to continue exclusive breastfeeding for the recommended six months minimum.
\n3. Determine current breastfeeding practices and to identify cultural barriers to breastfeeding.
\n4. Determine if there are existing breastfeeding promotion programs and what, if any, changes could be made to these health promotion programs to reduce the suggested barriers to breastfeeding.
\nDescriptive statistics were used to organize and summarize the information
\nobtained from a sample (n = 141) o f the population. Analysis was used first to determine whether or not a mother chose to breastfeed, and second to determine for how long a mother breastfed exclusively. Reasons why mothers chose to breastfeed or chose not to breastfeed/to discontinue breastfeeding were also analyzed. The results from the KAP study suggest most Khmer mothers have a high level of confidence regarding their breastfeeding skills. Most women are not shy to breastfeed in public and feel a strong sense of belonging to their communities. Similarly, Khmer mothers are more likely to breastfeed if they are older, well-educated, and feel supported. Likewise, a mother?s decision not to breastfeed/to discontinue breastfeeding is largely influenced by the social inequalities in her environment. The decision not to breastfeed cannot be attributed solely to any one factor yet each contributing factor is greatly compounded by the injustice of poverty. The conditions in which Cambodian mothers must make decisions for their health and the health or their children are appalling. Moreover, professional breastfeeding support programs do not exist in Krong Kep, Cambodia. Unlike in Canada where almost all women have access to many health promotion programs (Healthy Babies, Healthy Children, La Leche League, prenatal classes, etc.) mothers in Cambodia do not have this luxury. It is extremely hard for Cambodian mothers to overcome the barriers to breastfeeding without the correct support
\nand without access to culturally sensitive public health breastfeeding programs.
\nLastly, breastfeeding in Cambodia is a cultural experience between mother and child. Khmer women are experts in their own culture and health promotion programs must take a humble approach to traditional practices such as roasting and the use of traditional medicines following childbirth. Khmer mothers must not be induced to breastfeed through guilt and thus international recommendations regarding breastfeeding initiation and duration should be examined in a Cambodian context. Further research and
\nrespectful cross-cultural dialogue is needed in order to enable Khmer mothers to increase control over health based decisions in their lives and to and improve maternal and child health in Cambodia.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,344
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,339
Écart entre enseignants0,298 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University)Même sujetBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesTravaux en français237 207