Narrative Medicine in Social Work: Family and Generational Violence
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Narrative non-fiction traces its origins to journalism, with authors telling true stories in the first person, employing all the elements of fiction: the use of scenes, dramatic moments, description, character arc, structure, dialogue, and theme. Narrative-based medicine (NBM) is the application of narrative ideas to the practice of medicine (Zaharias, 2018) and other health professions, such as social work. It focuses on the lived experience of healthcare professionals, their patients, and their families to promote understanding, empathy, and meaning-making. A review by DasGupta and Charon (2019) noted that narrative methods, including storytelling and reflective writing, have been associated with increased empathy and improved patient outcomes. These findings suggest that incorporating narrative approaches into medical education and practice can positively impact both providers and patients. According to the book, Narrative in social work practice: The Power and Possibility of the Story (Burack-Weiss et al., 2017[JC1] ), the use of narrative medicine to explore a case seeks to understand complex, ambiguous phenomena while appreciating the lived experience. The benefits of using narrative cases for learners is to provide real-world scenarios that they may encounter in their professional practice. These cases can help students develop critical thinking, problem-solving, and decision-making skills by analyzing complex situations and identifying appropriate interventions. Additionally, narrative cases can promote empathy and cultural sensitivity by exposing students to diverse perspectives and experiences (Bolton & Howlett, 2010). In this dissertation, the author has created three essays of narrative medicine involving the theme of intergenerational trauma and violence to stimulate learning in the social work education classroom with critical questions.\nThe National Association of Social Workers (NASW) recognizes the value of narrative writing in social work practice, particularly in developing case studies that reflect the complex realities of social work. According to the NASW, case studies written in a narrative format can offer a more engaging and effective way to convey the experiences of clients and social workers. By incorporating narrative writing into social work education and practice, social workers can better understand the diverse perspectives of clients and collaborate with them to achieve more personalized and effective interventions.\nKey Words: domestic violence, generational violence, school-based mental health, narrative medicine.\nReferences:\nBennett, S. (2011). Confidentiality in clinical writing: Ethical dilemmas in publishing case material from clinical social work practice. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 81(1), 7-25. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/00377317.2011.543039\nBolton, G., & Howlett, S. (2010). Reflective Writing for Nursing, Health and Social Work. Sage Publications Ltd.\nBurack-Weiss, Lawrence, L. S., Mijangos, L. B. (EDS.). (2017). Narrative in social work practice : the power and possibility of story. Columbia University Press.\nDasGupta, S., & Charon, R. (2019). Impact of narrative medicine: A review of the evidence by the story medicine working group. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 34(2), 404-409.\nKelly, M. S., Massat, C. R., & Constable, R. (2021). School social work: Practice, policy, and research (9th ed.). Oxford University Press.\nNational Association of Social Work. (2021). Code of Ethics: English. https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English\nReamer, F. G. (2013). Ethics and values. In Encyclopedia of social work.\nZaharias G. (2018). What is narrative-based medicine? Narrative-based medicine. Canadian family physician, 64(3), 176–180.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».