Natural Resources in Urban Contexts: Actions and Evaluation Tools in Local Planning
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This paper is focused on the local sustainability approach involved in the local plan. Local sustainability can be defined as the chance by an intervention on the building-environmental system of locally fostering the relationship between natural value, considered as the sum of all the intervention’s positive impacts in terms of environmental compatibility, cultural and natural improvement, induced social and economic effects, and total costs, considered as the sum of production costs, management costs, social costs through time, building deconstruction or refurbishment. The ‘local’ concept of sustainability plays a key role in adapting choices and actions to prearranged aims. This term relates to the territorial context in which the intervention lays, identified by an integrated framework of social, cultural, environmental and landscape elements. The boundaries of such a context can’t be outlined in a clear and ultimate way, because of the ever-changing of its own components. In order to test the local acceptation of sustainability as practice, we are working on the implementation of Green Building Challenge (GBC), an international project initiated in 1998 by a group of researchers from University of British Columbia and Natural Resources Canada. The GBC process has now been through two cycles: the first phase has been called GBC ’98, instead the second one is named GBC 2000. Starting from the comparison with other already existing assessment methods, such as LEED or BREEAM, the first objective of the working group was to overcome the shortcomings of those tools tied to contingent needs and designed to achieve pragmatic aims. The purpose was to integrate a number of heterogeneous performance issues in a unique consistent framework. The second objective was to integrate new issues not adequately been considered until then, such as indoor environmental quality, building’s longevity, etc. An another new element compared to existing evaluation methods was the international nature of the project, which could bring an exchange of information and results otherwise confined to a either national or regional context. The working hypothesis under development consists in designing a method extended to the building’s context, in order to optimize not only the building itself but also the area in which the latter is placed and the respective urban connections. Indeed, despite the constant references to sustainability, the GBC suggested method is focused on the assessment of environmental building performance. The working group is nevertheless oriented at regarding the health of the biosphere, that is its ability to maintain its own functional integrity and to remain biologically productive, as the limiting factor for sustainability and its prerequisite. This layout is stemmed from the belief that the economic and social issues which complete, together with the environmental one, the complex notion of sustainability, can’t be usefully assessed at the scale of an individual building. The developed case study allows a concrete description of the formulated hypothesis and the played out research.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».