MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7022171006

Jason Lorenzon

2020· article· en· W7022171006 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueScholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University) · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueInternational Law and Aviation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPassionBachelorAviationPoliticsDreamCertificateNaturalizationWindsorFlight training
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Jason Lorenzon is a FAA licensed Commercial Pilot with a multi engine, and instrument ratings. He also is an FAA licensed Certified Flight Instructor, Instruments and Multi-Engine. He was one of the first pilot/lawyers to receive the Remote Pilot In Command sUAV FAA Certificate in Ohio.\nMr. Lorenzon’s first passion was always aviation. When his parents would not let him achieve his dream of becoming a pilot, he would sneak to the Windsor Airport as a teenager and by the age of eighteen he received his Canadian Private Pilot’s License. As only one college in Canada offered an aviation degree, Mr. Lorenzon followed his other passion of Political Science and Music at the University of Western Ontario. While there, he even petitioned unsuccessfully, for an Aviation Program. He was awarded two degrees in 1995, a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and a Bachelor of Music (with distinction). Mr. Lorenzon continued his graduate studies at the Cleveland Institute of Music.\nAs a lawyer, Jason Lorenzon’s passion is to help people achieve “the American Dream” and to keep families united and to keep pilots flying. His desire to help others comes from his deep faith and many years serving the Roman Catholic Church as a Director of Music Ministry, prior to his career as a lawyer. Mr. Lorenzon is an immigrant himself, coming to the United States as a student on an F-1 visa in 1995, and his goal is to help others do the same. Mr. Lorenzon obtained his green card in 2000 and United States’ citizenship in 2006. While Mr. Lorenzon was a successful church musician and international organ competition award winner when he came to this country, he utilizes all of his talents and knowledge to assist clients in the legal process.\nMr. Lorenzon is a graduate of the Cleveland State University Marshall College of Law and his Bar admissions include the State of Ohio, State of Florida, and the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Southern District of Ohio, Middle District of Florida, Southern District of Florida, and the Sixth Circuit Court Circuit of Appeals. While he attended Cleveland State, he worked full time and was managing editor of the Journal of Law and Health.\nWhen he can, Mr. Lorenzon generously volunteers his services to the community, and was recently was honored for his work in foreclosure defense, when he received the “Volunteer of the Year for the Community Legal Services of Akron Award.” Additionally, in 2010, he was awarded the Community Service Award for Attorneys 40 & Under for District 11 by the Ohio State Bar Foundation and he was named a Rising Star by Ohio Super Lawyers for the area of immigration for 2011. He serves on the Aviation Law Committee of the Florida Bar. In 2016, Mr. Lorenzon was named as chair of the Aviation Law Committee of Ohio State Bar Association.\nFinally, Mr. Lorenzon dedicates his time to community service. He volunteers his time by serving as trustee on the Akron Symphony Board, and serves as Chair of the Board of Zoning Appeals for the Village of Richfield and serves as a Safety Lead for the FAA Safety Team program.\nMr. Lorenzon teaches Aviation Law, Aviation Security, and Policy and periodically instructs Flight Tech majors at the Kent State Airport.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,988
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,944

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,002
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,046
Tête enseignante GPT0,255
Écart entre enseignants0,209 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueScholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University)Même sujetInternational Law and AviationTravaux en français237 207