MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7023654400

Occupation Displacement and Community Corrections Offenders: The Usefulness of Concepts of Occupation on Assessment, Intervention, and Policy in Community Corrections

2011· article· en· W7023654400 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCommonKnowledge Research Repository (Pacific University Oregon) · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueOccupational Therapy Practice and Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésVolition (linguistics)InjusticeDisplacement (psychology)Criminal justiceEconomic JusticeWork (physics)Occupational safety and health
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Purpose: Criminal justice settings significantly restrict an inmate’s occupational opportunities and promote occupational injustice and deprivation (Muñoz & Farnworth, 2009). Including healthy occupational choices and engagement opportunities in treatment, and measures of engagement in outcomes provides a more hopeful and potentially effective way to measure success in community reintegration of offenders (Molineux & Whiteford, 1999). This mixed-method study examined the utility of occupation-based assessments and examined the connections between occupational engagement or, role diversity, and substance abuse.\nMethods: Participants: Forty volunteers (male N=32) residing in a community corrections facility, mean age of 34.33. Ninety percent had been incarcerated for less than 2 years and 87% crimes were related to substance abuse. Measures: Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM); Occupational Self-Assessment (OSA); Semi-structured interviews; Demographic data (Clarke, 2003; Eggers, Munoz, Sciulli, & Crist, 2006). Analysis: Interview data examined in relation to COPM/OSA data and for examples and descriptions of occupational displacement, impoverishment, and alienation.\nResults: COPM results are consistent with the criminal justice literature indicating that offenders rate performance skills higher, but with lower satisfaction with their performance. OSA average scores indicated that offenders typically have higher rated performance (28.41), than habituation (12.03) and volition (11.87), but have few healthy habits and volition to support successful skill application. The greatest occupational limitations on OSA items were: making decisions based on what they think is important; getting done what they need to do; having a satisfying routine; and working toward goals. The items considered most important were being involved as a student, worker, volunteer, family member; and working toward goals. Most participants asserted that alcohol or drug use had stopped them from achieving goals and making changes in their lives. This suggests a rationale for occupation-based intervention to give meaning, purpose and structure to clients' abstinence-related goals.\nOngoing qualitative data analysis identified examples of occupational displacement (White, 1999), occupation alienation, and impoverishment of occupational options, supporting the idea that chronic substance abuse displaces time and interest available to engage in other occupations. Even when in recovery, occupational impoverishment persists due to strength of habits established during chronic abuse contributing to alienation in occupations that are pursued.\nSummary: We expand the concept of occupational displacement and its contribution to occupational science, and build a case for inclusion of occupation-based assessments intervention to support successful community reintegration and counter occupational injustices.\nObjectives for Discussion Period: Discuss application of occupational justice theories in criminal justice settings as opposed to more traditional criminal justice rehabilitation approaches. Discuss the potential to use the data to promote a more systematic and consistent measures of outcomes in criminal justice settings that may promote increased occupational justice in policies and programs. Discuss the relevance and application of the concept of occupational displacement in this study and its potential usefulness in occupational science research. \nOr framed as discussion questions: How might understandings of occupational justice be used to influence policy in criminal justice? Which occupational science concepts are likely to be the most powerful in crafting policies that promote occupational justice toward rehabilitative outcomes in correctional settings? What quantitative and qualitative tools would likely yield the most fruitful outcomes for informing criminal justice policies and programs to minimize occupational injustices in corrections. Considering a definition of Occupational displacement as: “when the demands of engaging in one occupation rule out, or at least place obstacles in the way of, engaging in another occupation, formerly pursued on a regular basis.” (White, 1999, p. 163), how useful is this concept in researching occupation, especially in populations in which the displacement is related to chronic substance abuse? What other populations experience occupational displacement for which occupational science research would be beneficial and what would such a study look like?

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,167
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,258
Tête enseignante GPT0,483
Écart entre enseignants0,226 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle