Reformulating underused facilities through adaptive reuse: making and remaking the architecture of Copper Cliff, Ontario
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Industries have a history of shaping the development and heritage of communities. \nIn the case of Copper Cliff, the mining industry has influenced the architecture and culture \nof the community. However, these mining operations no longer operate how they were \ncreated. The community of Copper Cliff has transitioned from a miners’ town into an extension \nof Greater Sudbury. This area encompasses a wide range of professionals that live and \nwork across the city. The constant pursuit of a sustainable future has informed this evolution. \nTechnology has permitted people to work from a distance, which has become a reality for \nmany industries more recently with the pandemic. The industrial vision within Copper Cliff \nis to reduce the environmental impact, and to become world leaders in this sector. There \nare areas within this industry that have negatively impacted the land. Key issues that are \nrelevant today are the waste management and water reclamation processes. A place for \nfurther research and development would benefit both the industry and this community. The philosophy of tearing down underused facilities within industrial areas is \nstill a major problem. To sustain a viable plan for growth and to maintain the existing \ncommunity and surrounding areas it is essential to consider adaptive reuse. By analyzing \nthe culture, mining industry and the architecture within Copper Cliff, the design proposal \nwill provide a balance of these components. This community’s unique making and \nremaking principles are represented within the following three elements. The architecture \nundergoes a new life through adaptive reuse principles. The culture emphasizes the \narts and crafts of this built community and the reuse of materials and waste for a new \npurpose. The industry is represented by their long history of mining in this area, and their \nconstant need to improve and remake these mining processes to increase sustainability. \nThe purpose for this thesis document is to explore the methods and strategies of reusing facilities \nthat are underused and proposing a new function for them before they become obsolete. \nThis will provide the community with more options for the future and prevent the industry from \ndemolishing and removing all community input. This project will consider the rich history of \nthe community, and how this heritage can be represented through adaptive reuse. This will \nbring the architecture, mining, and culture together at the center of this design proposal.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».