MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7024732451

Strength evaluation of unreinforced early-age masonry structures and their temporary bracing using numerical and experimental studies

2025· article· en· W7024732451 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueMineralogy and Gemology Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMasonryBracingUnreinforced masonry buildingMortarMasonry veneer
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Masonry construction remains a fundamental choice for buildings due to its durability, energy efficiency, and aesthetic appeal. However, the stability of masonry structures during the early construction stages presents significant challenges. When masonry walls are first erected, the mortar has not yet developed sufficient strength to provide adequate support, leaving the walls vulnerable to lateral forces such as wind. This early-age instability can lead to partial or total collapse, posing serious safety risks to workers and causing material loss. One of the most widely adopted solutions for mitigating instability during construction is temporary bracing. Temporary bracing systems are employed to provide lateral support to masonry walls, ensuring they remain upright until the mortar achieves adequate strength. These systems are essential for maintaining structural integrity in the early stages of construction, preventing accidents, and minimizing material wastage. However, in Canada, existing masonry design standards do not offer comprehensive recommendations for the implementation of bracing, leaving engineers to rely on judgment and experience rather than quantitative design methods. This lack of formalized guidelines introduces uncertainty into construction practices, increasing the potential for failures. This research aims to develop a more rigorous understanding of early-age masonry behaviour and provide improved methodologies for the design of temporary bracing systems. To achieve this objective, an experimental program was conducted, covering multiple levels of masonry behaviour. At the material level, tests were performed to examine the early-age mechanical properties of mortar, focusing on strength development over time. These tests provided insight into the rate at which masonry gains sufficient strength to resist applied loads. At the assemblage level, experiments were conducted on small masonry specimens to investigate the bond behaviour between mortar and units under different loading conditions, including compression and tension. Finally, full-scale wall tests were performed to analyze the lateral stability of masonry structures under controlled conditions. These large-scale experiments helped quantify the structural response of walls at different curing stages and provided valuable data for validating numerical models. In parallel with the experimental investigations, a numerical modeling framework was developed to simulate the behaviour of early-age masonry structures. Finite element models were constructed to replicate the physical test conditions, incorporating time-dependent material properties to simulate the evolving strength of mortar. The models were employed to conduct parametric studies, assessing the influence of variables such as wall height, bracing configurations, loading, and environmental factors on overall stability. By comparing numerical results with experimental observations, the research established a reliable predictive guideline for assessing temporary bracing requirements under different construction scenarios. Based on the experimental and numerical findings, design recommendations and guidelines were developed for the efficient design of temporary bracing, including design tables that offer practical guidelines for ensuring masonry stability during early construction stages. The design temporary bracing guideline bridges the gap between experimental research and practical application, enabling more reliable and standardized approaches to temporary bracing design. The proposed methodology will assist engineers in developing more effective bracing design strategies, reducing the risk of construction-related failures and promoting safer work environments. Additionally, it contributes to optimizing material usage and minimizing construction delays, ultimately leading to more cost-effective and resilient masonry construction.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,131
Tête enseignante GPT0,345
Écart entre enseignants0,215 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueScholarship@Western (Western University)Même sujetMineralogy and Gemology StudiesTravaux en français237 207