Notice bibliographique
Résumé
G This chapter presents results about the provision of unpaid social care by adults aged 16 and over.This is defined as help or support provided to someone because of longterm physical or mental ill-health, a disability or problems relating to old age.It excludes any help given in a professional capacity or as part of a job.G 17% of adults provided unpaid help or support to other people, with women more likely than men to do so (20% and 14% respectively). G Provision of unpaid care varied by region.The highest proportions of people providing care were found in Yorkshire and the Humber and the East Midlands for both men and women, and also in the East of England for women (21-23%).Proportions providing care were lowest in the North West for both sexes (10% for men, 16% for women), and also relatively low in the West Midlands and London among men (11-12%).G Prevalence of providing unpaid care was lowest among those in higher income households (11-13% of men, 17-20% of women in the highest two quintiles), and increased with decreasing income (16-17% of men, 23% of women in the lowest two quintiles).G There has been little change between 2011-2014 in the proportions reporting that they provide care and support.Over the period, 14-15% of men and 18-20% of women said that they did so.G Care was most commonly provided to a parent; nearly half of adults who provided care did this (49%).Men were more likely than women to provide help or support for a spouse or partner, with just under a fifth doing so (19%, compared with 12% of women).Help to other categories of family members, neighbours and friends was provided by under 10% in each case. GThe people to whom care was provided varied according to the age of the carer.Those under 65 were likely to be caring for parents (44% aged 16-44, 65% aged 45-64).Among carers aged 16-44, care for a grandparent was also relatively common (21%).Older carers were more likely than younger ones to help their spouses (34% of carers aged 65 and over, compared with 7-12% in younger age groups), friends (15% and 6-7% respectively) and neighbours (16% and 3-5% respectively).G Most commonly, those who provided help and support said that they did so for between 1-9 hours in the last week (48% of adults providing care).However, a substantial proportion of men and women provided more care: 27% provided 10 or more hours in the last week.G Carers who provided at least 20 hours of care in the last week were asked about the types of activities they helped with.The most frequently mentioned were two instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs); shopping for food and getting out of the house (each 76%).Of a range of activities of daily living (ADLs), the most common was helping people take their medicine (52%), followed by help with bathing, dressing and eating (between 39% and 43%).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,203 | 0,037 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».