State regulation of interethnic integration in border regions: theoretical aspect
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The complex mechanism of state regulation of ethnic relations in Ukraine within the subject field of the science "Public Administration" has been investigated in the dissertation. The system approach based on the scientific research of domestic and foreign scientists was carried out. National priorities and regional peculiarities of national ethnic policy of Ukraine were identified. The current terminological apparatus in the sphere of ethno-national policy of Ukraine has been systematized in the thesis. Definition interpretations of the terms "international integration", "national minority", "state ethno-national policy" were made. The term "kin-state" instead of commonly used "historical motherland" as well as the term "kin-minority" as the characteristic of a minority that shares common origin with the ethnic majority of the kin state were proposed . The acculturation theory of J. Berry, a Canadian sociologist, served as a basis for the analysis of minorities integration or disintegration processes. The dominant type of acculturation is defined by three parameters. The first one is the normative-legal basis (legislative regulation) which is established in the state, where a minority lives. It regulates their rights, establishes general freedoms for citizens as well as special preferences. The second parameter is the practice of involving minoritiesâ participation in a social and political life of the country with linguistic policy as an important component. The third one is the influence of a "kin-stateâ which can be manifested in different forms. European experience of the state regulation of ethno-political processes was analysed. It was stated that German-Danish experience and Romanian experience of cooperation with national-cultural societies could serve as positive examples of an integration model. It could be the most suitable one for being adapted to Ukrainian border regions. The analysis of the activities of regional state executive bodies of Chemivtsi oblast was performed. It concerned the implementation of an integration model of state regulation of ethno-national relations. The program-target approach was applied to formulating proposals in the sphere of state regulation of interethnic integration. Problems were structured and grouped into subproblems, their connection was defined. A specific means for eliminating the problems was offered. The sequence of program events and distribution of resources between them was formed. The mechanism for managing and supervising of the implementation of the program was worked out. The model of implementing interethnic integration in border regions was consructed. The model presupposes accomplishing the tasks in the following spheres: normative and legal regulation, ensuring participation of a minority in a social life, establishing cooperation with a "kin" state, institutional support of the course of actions on interethnic integration. Introduction of the mentioned tasks will facilitate the implementation of an integration model of state ethnic policy. A number of negative factors connected with stereotypes and segregation mood should be eliminated. In a long-term period, implementation of these actions will be one of the factors for decreasing emigration torrents from border regions. As a result of these actions, international concord will be achieved and minorities will be included in a political nation. Implementation of the model at a regional level may take place by means of adopting Regional program for interethnic integration of national minorities. The results of the investigation can be applied in the practice of state agencies and local governments and they can be used as the basis for further research in public administration of ethno-national relations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».