Treatment outcome of children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in HUSM
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction \nAcute lymphoblastic leukaemia is the most common malignant disease in children. There \nis neither national or international consensus about risk assignment, and no uniformed \nchemotherapy regime accepted. As a result, it is often difficult to compare the outcome \nfrom one group with another. In Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM), the \nchildren were treated using EORTC protocol. Other centers in Malaysia treat childhood \nALL with different treatment protocol. There was only one formal study reported \nregarding the outcome of children with ALL in Malaysia. However none comparative \nstudy of the effectiveness of each treatment protocol carried in Malaysian population. \nThis study was the first to analyse childhood ALL in HUSM. \nObjectives \nThe main objective was to evaluate treatment outcome of children with ALL who \nreceived chemotherapy at Pediatric Oncology Unit in HUSM. The specific objective was \nto determine survival rate and risk factors for relapsed ALL and death among children \nwith ALL treated with EORTC treatment protocol.Methodology \nThe study was conducted at Pediatric Oncology Unit in HUSM. This was a retrospective \nstudy involving children with ALL who was diagnosed and treated between I sl January \n1990 and 31 sl December 2003. Children aged I to 13 years and fulfilled the inclusion and \nexclusion criteria would be enroll in the study. \nResults \nThere were a total of 138 children with diagnosis of ALL and received treatment at \nPediatric Oncology Unit in HUSM from ISIJanuary 1990 to 31 s1 December 2003. A total \nof 102 children who fulfilled all inclusion and exclusion criteria were available for \nfurther review. The mean duration of follow-up was 93 months (SD 40). The minimum \nfollow-up duration was 37 months and maximum duration was 186 months. Most of \nrelapse occurred within 2 year after diagnosis. Only 2 cases of relapse occurred 5 years \nafter diagnosis. Isolated BM relapse (22%) was the most common site of relapse. Overall \nEFS rate at 1, 3 and 5 years was 81.4% (SE ± 3.9), 59.8% (SE ± 4.9) and 55.3% (SE ± \n5.0) respectively. Multiple Cox proportional analysis showed children aged, WBC count at diagnosis and \nearly response to single prednisolone were the significant prognostic factors for the \noutcome of children with ALL. There was increased risk of poor outcome (relapse or \ndeath) in children aged at 10 to 13 years at about 4 times (95% CI 1.47; 10.44, p=0.006); \n2.3 times (95% CI 1.09; 5.00, p=0.030) in children with WBC count at diagnosis more \nthan 100.0 X103/!lL; and those poor early response to single prednisolone at about 2.6 \ntimes (95% CI 1.28; 5.20, p=0.008). \nConclusion \nSurvival in this was comparable to developing countries but study remained low \ncompared to developed countries. Most of relapse occurred within 2 year after diagnosis \nwith isolated BM relapse was being the most common site of relapse.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».