“When you add Black and Female, it’s almost like a double whammy”: The Gendered and Racialized Experiences of Professional Integration among Internationally Educated Health Professionals in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Scholars have noted that migration of health professionals is a global phenomenon. According to the World Health Organization, the immigration of internationally educated health professionals (IEHPs) to Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries has increased in the past decade by 60 percent (WHO, 2022). Canada is one of the OECD countries that IEHPs may find attractive. While academics have identified the many barriers for professional integration IEHPs in Canada, there is a gap in the literature in relation to how gender shapes the experiences of professional integration within the Canadian context. My thesis aimed to fill this gap in the literature. \nSpecific Aims: The specific aim of the study was to determine how gender and race shape the professional integration experiences of IEHPs in Canada by focusing on the intersection of gender, race and ethnicity. \nMethods: The study employed a qualitative research design and was informed by feminist methodology. Theoretically, the research was grounded in the theory of intersectionality. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 IEHPs. The analysis applied Winker & Degele’s (2011) framework for an intersectional multi-level analysis. \nResults: Six stories of IEHPs working in different fields of the Canadian health care setting are featured in the results to describe the participants’ experiences. The stories draw on comparisons with other participants’ accounts and illuminate the complexity of the immigration process and the institutional barriers to professional integration. They also show how race and country of education shape the process of professional integration. Lastly, the stories illustrate how gendered roles, and in particular motherhood, shape the process of professional integration of IEHPs, while revealing the unique challenges IEHPs who are also women of colour may encounter. \nConclusion: The results from the study illustrate how the intersection of gender, race and professional identity create unique contexts for IEHPs, as they seek out their professional integration. This study is one of the first studies to explore how gender shapes professional integration of internationally educated health professionals within Canada . The findings of the study illustrate how social identities may enable or hinder peoples’ experiences of professional integration. Lastly, the study demonstrates how racist ideologies are embedded in regulatory policies and practices and hinder professional integration of some IEHPs.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».