THE VALUE OF GLOBAL LEARNING FOR NORTHERN AND INDIGENOUS STUDENTS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I arrived in Canada as an international student from Norway in 2001, seeking to learn more about my Canadian ancestry and history. The most profound lessons about Canada were gifted through my experiences being welcomed into northern and Indigenous communities while working with the joint Master of Governance and Entrepreneurship in Northern and Indigenous Areas (GENI) and the Johnson Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy (JSGS) and University of Saskatchewan (USask). These experiences have motivated me to improve access to equitable higher education for Indigenous Peoples and Northern communities. It has also encouraged me to support the decolonization of higher education institutions to uplift Indigenous knowledge, research, and voices. My commitment to reconciliation is deeply intertwined with my research approach and study. This study completed a qualitative summative program evaluation of the GENI that was created with the intent to build capacity for northern and Indigenous communities with relevant programming and learning to encourage sustainable futures. Building on the lessons from Northern graduate programming, the GENI program integrated international field schools (IFSs) to deliver relevant lessons for communities building their own sustainable futures. Though operating for a full decade, the GENI program has not adequately evaluated how the IFSs are relevant to the program’s original aim to build capacity in Northern and Indigenous communities. Concurrently, the program has experienced increased pressure regarding its financial viability due to its small cohorts and resource-intense program delivery structure that includes the maintenance of an international partnership, international mobility, and facilitating community relationships. Recognizing the need to make decisions regarding the long-term delivery plan for the GENI program and the IFS, it became vital to collect data on student experiences and learning. Hence, the overarching objective of the study was to build an understanding of the values of the global learning provided by the IFSs for the GENI students and their Northern communities. In addition, the study was guided by three related secondary questions: What were the IFS learning outcomes for GENI alumni? How relevant are the GENI IFSs in building human capacity in Indigenous and Northern communities? How does the GENI provide lessons for higher education institutions to engage Indigenous students in international study abroad activities? The GENI and MNGD alumni, as research participants, provided a rich dataset collected through semi-structured interviews while also leading the meaning-making of the narratives by participating in an axial coding exercise as a focus group. The study's findings highlight how the IFS offers wholistic learning experiences centred around self-determination, community cohorts of learners, land-based learning, and life-long transformative learning. The research participants identified seven overarching values of global learning provided by their IFS experience. These values encompass outcomes related to appreciating Indigenous worldviews, developing personal skills, and creating community change-makers. Consequently, the study concluded that the IFS aligns directly with the original GENI program objective. Global learning can provide relevant lessons to build capacity in Northern and Indigenous communities by empowering individuals to become community change-makers. The findings of the program evaluation were analyzed using the Gaudry and Lorenz's (2018) Indigenization framework offering that the GENI and the IFSs provide lessons for decolonizing international study abroad activities. As such, the study added to the intersectionality of Indigenization and Internationalization in Canadian higher education, by highlighting synergies in the practice of decolonizing internationalization. With lessons from the GENI IFSs, student narratives and the 4Rs, the study offers seven practical lessons for decolonizing study abroad activities in Canadian higher education.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».