MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7025466065

THE VALUE OF GLOBAL LEARNING FOR NORTHERN AND INDIGENOUS STUDENTS

2025· article· en· W7025466065 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHistorical Influence and Diplomacy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousSummative assessmentCapacity buildingCorporate governanceEntrepreneurshipSustainable communityTraditional knowledgeValue (mathematics)MentorshipTransformative learning
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I arrived in Canada as an international student from Norway in 2001, seeking to learn more about my Canadian ancestry and history. The most profound lessons about Canada were gifted through my experiences being welcomed into northern and Indigenous communities while working with the joint Master of Governance and Entrepreneurship in Northern and Indigenous Areas (GENI) and the Johnson Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy (JSGS) and University of Saskatchewan (USask). These experiences have motivated me to improve access to equitable higher education for Indigenous Peoples and Northern communities. It has also encouraged me to support the decolonization of higher education institutions to uplift Indigenous knowledge, research, and voices. My commitment to reconciliation is deeply intertwined with my research approach and study. This study completed a qualitative summative program evaluation of the GENI that was created with the intent to build capacity for northern and Indigenous communities with relevant programming and learning to encourage sustainable futures. Building on the lessons from Northern graduate programming, the GENI program integrated international field schools (IFSs) to deliver relevant lessons for communities building their own sustainable futures. Though operating for a full decade, the GENI program has not adequately evaluated how the IFSs are relevant to the program’s original aim to build capacity in Northern and Indigenous communities. Concurrently, the program has experienced increased pressure regarding its financial viability due to its small cohorts and resource-intense program delivery structure that includes the maintenance of an international partnership, international mobility, and facilitating community relationships. Recognizing the need to make decisions regarding the long-term delivery plan for the GENI program and the IFS, it became vital to collect data on student experiences and learning. Hence, the overarching objective of the study was to build an understanding of the values of the global learning provided by the IFSs for the GENI students and their Northern communities. In addition, the study was guided by three related secondary questions: What were the IFS learning outcomes for GENI alumni? How relevant are the GENI IFSs in building human capacity in Indigenous and Northern communities? How does the GENI provide lessons for higher education institutions to engage Indigenous students in international study abroad activities? The GENI and MNGD alumni, as research participants, provided a rich dataset collected through semi-structured interviews while also leading the meaning-making of the narratives by participating in an axial coding exercise as a focus group. The study's findings highlight how the IFS offers wholistic learning experiences centred around self-determination, community cohorts of learners, land-based learning, and life-long transformative learning. The research participants identified seven overarching values of global learning provided by their IFS experience. These values encompass outcomes related to appreciating Indigenous worldviews, developing personal skills, and creating community change-makers. Consequently, the study concluded that the IFS aligns directly with the original GENI program objective. Global learning can provide relevant lessons to build capacity in Northern and Indigenous communities by empowering individuals to become community change-makers. The findings of the program evaluation were analyzed using the Gaudry and Lorenz's (2018) Indigenization framework offering that the GENI and the IFSs provide lessons for decolonizing international study abroad activities. As such, the study added to the intersectionality of Indigenization and Internationalization in Canadian higher education, by highlighting synergies in the practice of decolonizing internationalization. With lessons from the GENI IFSs, student narratives and the 4Rs, the study offers seven practical lessons for decolonizing study abroad activities in Canadian higher education.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,078
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,155

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0210,021
Communication savante0,0150,005
Science ouverte0,0020,021
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,231
Écart entre enseignants0,225 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Même sujetHistorical Influence and DiplomacyTravaux en français237 207